• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经会阴与经直肠磁共振成像融合引导前列腺活检对前列腺癌的检出及并发症的影响。

Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.

机构信息

Urology Division, UConn Health, Farmington, CT.

University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT.

出版信息

Urology. 2023 Jul;177:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.003
PMID:37059232
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rates of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and complications associated with transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR) biopsy approaches to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified men who underwent TP or TR MRI-targeted biopsy with concurrent systematic random biopsy from August 2020 to August 2021. Primary outcomes were detection rates of csPCa and 30-day complication rates between the 2 MRI-biopsy groups. Data were additionally stratified by prior biopsy status.

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients were included in the analysis. No demographic differences were observed. No significant differences were observed between TP and TR approaches on any of the outcomes of interest. TR MRI-targeted biopsies identified csPCa in 47.2% of patients, and TP MRI-targeted biopsies identified csPCa in 48.6% of patients (P = .78). No significant differences were observed in csPCa detection between the 2 approaches for patients on active surveillance (P = .59), patients with prior negative biopsy (P = .34), and patients who were biopsy naïve (P = .19). Complication rates did not vary by approach (P = .45).

CONCLUSION

Neither the identification of csPCa by MRI-targeted biopsy nor rates of complications differed significantly based on a TR or TP approach. No differences were seen between MRI-targeted approaches based on prior biopsy or active surveillance status.

摘要

目的

评估经会阴(TP)和经直肠(TR)磁共振成像(MRI)融合靶向活检两种方法检测临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)和相关并发症的发生率。

材料与方法

我们回顾性地确定了 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 8 月间接受 TP 或 TR MRI 靶向活检并伴有系统随机活检的男性患者。主要结果是两种 MRI 活检组之间 csPCa 的检出率和 30 天并发症发生率。数据还按既往活检状态进行了分层。

结果

共纳入 361 例患者进行分析。未观察到人口统计学差异。在所有感兴趣的结果中,TP 和 TR 方法之间均未观察到显著差异。TR MRI 靶向活检在 47.2%的患者中发现 csPCa,而 TP MRI 靶向活检在 48.6%的患者中发现 csPCa(P=0.78)。对于主动监测的患者(P=0.59)、既往阴性活检的患者(P=0.34)和初次活检的患者(P=0.19),两种方法在 csPCa 的检测中均未观察到显著差异。两种方法的并发症发生率无差异(P=0.45)。

结论

无论采用 TR 还是 TP 方法,MRI 靶向活检对 csPCa 的检出率或并发症发生率均无显著差异。基于既往活检或主动监测状态,MRI 靶向方法之间未见差异。

相似文献

1
Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.经会阴与经直肠磁共振成像融合引导前列腺活检对前列腺癌的检出及并发症的影响。
Urology. 2023 Jul;177:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
2
Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经会阴与经直肠磁共振成像靶向活检对临床显著前列腺癌检出率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Dec;6(6):621-628. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经会阴磁共振成像靶向活检在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面可能优于经直肠途径:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e860-e870. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
Transperineal versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy in a large, ethnically diverse, and multiracial cohort.经会阴与经直肠 MRI/TRUS 融合引导前列腺活检在一个大型、种族多样化和多种族队列中的比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Sep-Oct;50(5):616-628. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0354.
5
A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.经会阴与经直肠 MRI-US 融合活检检测前列腺癌准确性的个体内非劣效性比较研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Sep;23(3):449-456. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0205-7. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFU-PR1).经会阴与经直肠磁共振成像靶向活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用:随机PERFECT试验(CCAFU-PR1)的最终结果
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Oct;7(5):1080-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
7
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review.磁共振成像/超声融合引导经会阴与磁共振成像/超声融合引导经直肠前列腺活检的比较:系统评价。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):904-913. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.012. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.经会阴与经直肠MRI/TRUS融合靶向活检:临床显著性前列腺癌的检出率
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.经直肠与经会阴磁共振靶向前列腺活检术诊断前列腺癌:一项多机构的欧洲泌尿外科学会-青年泌尿外科医生前列腺癌工作组研究
J Urol. 2022 Oct;208(4):830-837. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002802. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
10
Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.经直肠和经会阴微超声磁共振成像融合靶向前列腺活检的癌症检出率是否存在差异?一项倾向评分匹配研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0280262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280262. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Approach in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经会阴与经直肠前列腺活检方法在前列腺癌诊断中的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Dec 10;16(12):e75459. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75459. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Ultrasound-guided transperineal vs transrectal prostate biopsy: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and complication rates.超声引导下经会阴与经直肠前列腺穿刺活检:诊断准确性和并发症发生率的Meta分析
Open Med (Wars). 2024 Oct 2;19(1):20241039. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1039. eCollection 2024.
3
Transrectal versus transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate accuracy and complications.
经直肠与经会阴前列腺融合活检:配对分析评估准确性和并发症。
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 25;42(1):535. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05245-1.