Suppr超能文献

工作场所空气中低浓度丙烯腈个人监测方法的开发与验证:II. 热解吸与现场验证

Development and validation of personal monitoring methods for low levels of acrylonitrile in workplace atmosphere: II. Thermal desorption and field validation.

作者信息

Borders R A, Gluck S J, Sowle W F, Melcher R G

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Mar;47(3):158-63. doi: 10.1080/15298668691389513.

Abstract

Thermal desorption is a more sensitive alternative to solvent desorption for the determination of acrylonitrile in air. A dual-bed collection tube (Tenax GC and Carbosieve B) was developed for collecting and concentrating low levels of acrylonitrile. Two thermal desorption techniques were evaluated for the recovery of acrylonitrile collected on the dual-bed tubes over a concentration range from 0.05 to 5 ppm. A commercially-available system, the Century Programmable Thermal Desorption Unit, was easy to operate, allowed for multiple injections of the sample and had a recovery of 82 +/- 12% (RSD). Samples were stored for up to two months without affecting the recovery and there was not an observable effect from humidity or from the presence of other organic compounds. This system was found to have limitations at acrylonitrile concentrations above 1 ppm. A field validation study tested the sampling and analytical methods developed for monitoring low levels of acrylonitrile in the workplace. Three methods employing Pittsburgh Coconut-Base activated charcoal, Ambersorb XE-348 and Tenax-GC and Carbosieve B sampling mediums were validated for concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 5 ppm and confirmed in the field from 0.02 to 3 ppm in tests conducted at plant sites. These field studies were run over varying humidity and temperature conditions. The overall absolute recoveries and relative standard deviations found for these methods found during the field trials are 90 +/- 18% for charcoal; 85 +/- 11% for Ambersorb XE-348; and 90 +/- 19% for the Century dual-bed sorbent. These values were in quite good agreement with the 91 +/- 10%, 88 +/- 8%, and 82 +/- 12% determined in laboratory studies.

摘要

热解吸是测定空气中丙烯腈时比溶剂解吸更灵敏的替代方法。开发了一种双床收集管(Tenax GC和Carbosieve B)用于收集和浓缩低浓度的丙烯腈。评估了两种热解吸技术在0.05至5 ppm浓度范围内从双床管上回收丙烯腈的情况。一种市售系统,世纪可编程热解吸装置,操作简便,允许对样品进行多次进样,回收率为82±12%(相对标准偏差)。样品可保存长达两个月而不影响回收率,湿度或其他有机化合物的存在也未产生明显影响。发现该系统在丙烯腈浓度高于1 ppm时存在局限性。一项现场验证研究测试了为监测工作场所低浓度丙烯腈而开发的采样和分析方法。三种采用匹兹堡椰壳基活性炭、Amber sorb XE - 348以及Tenax - GC和Carbosieve B采样介质的方法在0.05至5 ppm浓度范围内得到验证,并在工厂现场进行的测试中在0.02至3 ppm范围内得到现场确认。这些现场研究在不同的湿度和温度条件下进行。在现场试验中发现这些方法的总体绝对回收率和相对标准偏差分别为:活性炭90±18%;Amber sorb XE - 348 85±11%;世纪双床吸附剂90±19%。这些值与实验室研究中测定的91±10%、88±8%和82±12%相当吻合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验