Signal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Department of Cardiology and Biomedical Research, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33205-z.
The use of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been continuously increasing over the last decades. However, cuff-based devices may cause discomfort, particularly at night, leading to potentially non-representative blood pressure (BP) values. We investigated the feasibility of a cuff-less BP monitoring solution in 67 subjects undergoing conventional 24-h ABPM. A watch-like optical sensor was attached at the upper arm or wrist at the contralateral side of the cuff. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) values were estimated from the measured optical signals by pulse wave analysis. Average 24-h, daytime and nighttime BP values were compared between the conventional monitor and the cuff-less sensor. The differences between both methods-expressed as mean ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement)-were of - 1.8 ± 6.2 mmHg (- 13.9, 10.3) on SBP and - 2.3 ± 5.4 mmHg (- 13.0, 8.3) on DBP for 24-h averages, of - 1.5 ± 6.6 mmHg (- 14.4, 11.4) on SBP and - 1.8 ± 5.9 mmHg (- 13.4, 9.9) on DBP for daytime averages, and of 0.4 ± 7.5 mmHg (- 14.4, 15.1) on SBP and - 1.3 ± 6.8 mmHg (- 14.7, 12.0) on DBP for nighttime averages. These results encouragingly suggest that cuff-less 24-h ABPM may soon become a clinical possibility.
在过去的几十年中,24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM)的使用一直在不断增加。然而,袖带式设备可能会引起不适,尤其是在夜间,从而导致血压值可能无法代表真实情况。我们在 67 名接受常规 24 小时 ABPM 的受试者中研究了无袖带血压监测解决方案的可行性。一个类似于手表的光学传感器被贴在上臂或手腕上,位于袖带的对侧。通过脉搏波分析,从测量的光学信号中估计收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)值。将常规监测仪和无袖带传感器测量的 24 小时平均、白天和夜间的血压值进行比较。两种方法之间的差异(表示为平均值±标准差(95%一致性界限)),在 24 小时平均血压方面,SBP 为-1.8±6.2mmHg(-13.9,10.3),DBP 为-2.3±5.4mmHg(-13.0,8.3);在白天平均血压方面,SBP 为-1.5±6.6mmHg(-14.4,11.4),DBP 为-1.8±5.9mmHg(-13.4,9.9);在夜间平均血压方面,SBP 为 0.4±7.5mmHg(-14.4,15.1),DBP 为-1.3±6.8mmHg(-14.7,12.0)。这些结果令人鼓舞地表明,无袖带 24 小时 ABPM 可能很快成为一种临床可能性。