• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全肘关节置换术后无菌性松动的基线人口统计学和危险因素比较。

Comparison of baseline demographics and risk factors for aseptic loosening following primary total elbow arthroplasty.

作者信息

Prior Harriet, Jamil Zenab, Rodriguez Ariel N, Swiggett Samuel J, Weisberg Miriam D, Razi Afshin E, Choueka Jack

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, 927 49th Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11219, USA.

College of Medicine, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):3153-3158. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03550-w. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-023-03550-w
PMID:37061573
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is a feared complication following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA); however, literature regarding factors that may contribute to this complication is limited. The aims of this investigation were to: (1) compare baseline demographics of patients who developed aseptic loosening following primary TEA; and (2) identify patient-specific risk factors for the development of loosening.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis using a nationwide claims database was performed to identify patients who underwent primary TEA and developed aseptic loosening within 2 years (study n = 307, control n = 10,741). Multivariate regression analysis generated odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and p-value of risk factors. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients who developed aseptic loosening had significant differences in numerous demographics, including age (p = 0.0001), sex (p = 0.0251), and various comorbid conditions such as obesity (15.96% vs. 8.36%, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the risk factors most associated with aseptic loosening were obesity (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.18-2.28, p = 0.002), male sex (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.13-2.00, p = 0.004), and concomitant opioid use disorder (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.15, p = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to identify demographics and patient-related risk factors associated with aseptic loosening following primary TEA. This evidence could be applied to the clinical setting in order to educate at-risk patients of this potential complication as well as inform their post-operative clinical management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Prognostic.

摘要

背景

无菌性松动是全肘关节置换术(TEA)后令人担忧的并发症;然而,关于可能导致该并发症的因素的文献有限。本研究的目的是:(1)比较初次TEA后发生无菌性松动的患者的基线人口统计学特征;(2)确定发生松动的患者特异性风险因素。

方法

使用全国性索赔数据库进行回顾性分析,以识别接受初次TEA并在2年内发生无菌性松动的患者(研究组n = 307,对照组n = 10,741)。多变量回归分析得出风险因素的比值比(OR)、95%置信区间(95%CI)和p值。p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

发生无菌性松动的患者在众多人口统计学特征方面存在显著差异,包括年龄(p = 0.0001)、性别(p = 0.0251)以及各种合并症,如肥胖(15.96%对8.36%,p < 0.0001)。此外,与无菌性松动最相关的风险因素是肥胖(OR 1.65,95%CI 1.18 - 2.28,p = 0.002)、男性(OR 1.51,95%CI 1.13 - 2.00,p = 0.004)和同时存在阿片类药物使用障碍(OR 1.58,95%CI 1.14 - 2.15,p = 0. 004)。

讨论

本研究首次确定了与初次TEA后无菌性松动相关的人口统计学特征和患者相关风险因素。该证据可应用于临床环境,以对有风险的患者进行这种潜在并发症的教育,并为其术后临床管理提供参考。

证据水平

III级:预后性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of baseline demographics and risk factors for aseptic loosening following primary total elbow arthroplasty.初次全肘关节置换术后无菌性松动的基线人口统计学和危险因素比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):3153-3158. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03550-w. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
Total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.全肘关节置换术治疗类风湿关节炎。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):967-980. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1465.R1.
3
Revision total elbow arthroplasty: Is it safe to perform a single-stage revision for presumed aseptic loosening based on clinical assessment, normal inflammatory markers, and a negative aspiration?翻修全肘关节置换术:基于临床评估、正常炎症标志物和阴性抽吸,对疑似无菌性松动行单阶段翻修是否安全?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
Kudo type-5 total elbow arthroplasty for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a minimum ten-year follow-up study.类风湿性关节炎患者的库多5型全肘关节置换术:一项至少十年的随访研究。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):818-823. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1033.R2.
5
The Impact of Cement Mantle Characteristics on Early Loosening in Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty.水泥套特征对初次全肘关节置换术后早期松动的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Dec;47(12):1146-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
6
Aseptic loosening rate of the humeral stem in the Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty. Does size matter?Coonrad-Morrey全肘关节置换术中肱骨干假体的无菌性松动率。尺寸重要吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jan;23(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.025.
7
Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty with the Semiconstrained Coonrad/Morrey Prosthesis: Follow-up to 21 Years.使用半限制性Coonrad/Morrey假体进行全肘关节置换翻修术:长达21年的随访
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Apr 7;103(7):618-628. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00889.
8
Impaction grafting in revision total elbow arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening and bone loss.在因无菌性松动和骨丢失导致的翻修全肘置换术中的嵌压植骨。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e741-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01737.
9
Revision total elbow arthroplasty failure rates: the impact of primary arthroplasty failure etiology on subsequent revisions.翻修全肘人工关节置换术失败率:初次人工关节置换术失败病因对后续翻修的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.010. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
Clinical results of revision total elbow arthroplasty: comparison of infected and non-infected total elbow arthroplasty.翻修全肘关节置换术的临床结果:感染性和非感染性全肘关节置换术的比较。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jun;43(6):1421-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4267-2. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term outcomes of instability related anterior glenoid fractures treated with open repair utilizing subscapularis split technique.采用肩胛下肌劈开技术行切开复位治疗不稳定相关前盂唇骨折的短期疗效。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2297-2302. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03424-7. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated With Higher Revision Rates in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.术前阿片类药物的使用与全关节置换术后更高的翻修率有关:一项系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Nov;36(11):3814-3821. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Primary total elbow arthroplasty.
初次全肘关节置换术
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Apr 20;18:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.015. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Long-term outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up.全肘关节置换术的长期疗效:10 年随访研究的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1423-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.014. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.全肘关节置换术治疗类风湿关节炎。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):967-980. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1465.R1.
6
The Cumulative Effect of Substance Abuse Disorders and Depression on Postoperative Complications After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.物质滥用障碍和抑郁症对初次全膝关节置换术后术后并发症的累积影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S151-S157. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Management of distal humerus fractures.肱骨远端骨折的处理。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jul;30(5):745-762. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02626-1. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.全肘关节置换术:临床结果、并发症和翻修手术。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(4):369-379. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.369. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
Comparison of implant related complications amongst patients with opioid use disorder and non-users following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后阿片类药物使用障碍患者与非使用者之间植入物相关并发症的比较。
World J Orthop. 2019 Mar 18;10(3):137-144. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i3.137.
10
Total Elbow Arthroplasty.全肘关节置换术
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jun;44(6):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.005. Epub 2019 Jan 8.