Kodama A, Mizuseki T, Adachi N
Hiroshima Prefectural Rehabilitation Center, Taguchi 295-3, Saijo, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-0036, Japan.
Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):818-823. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1033.R2.
We assessed the long-term (more than ten-year) outcomes of the Kudo type-5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
We reviewed 41 elbows (Larsen Grade IV, n = 21; Grade V, n = 20) in 31 patients with RA who had undergone a Kudo type-5 total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) between 1994 and 2003, and had been followed up for more than ten years. The humeral component was cementless and the all-polyethylene ulnar component cemented in every patient. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Mayo elbow performance score. We calculated the revision rate and evaluated potential risk factors for revision. The duration of follow-up was a mean 141 months (120 to 203).
Aseptic loosening of the ulnar component occurred in 11 elbows. There was no radiolucency around any humeral component. There was one deep infection. The survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was 87.8% after five years and 70.7% after ten years. The range of extension/flexion was a mean -38° (-80° to 0°)/105° (30° to 150°) before surgery and -40° (-70° to -20°)/132° (100° to 150°) at the final follow-up, while the mean Mayo elbow performance score was 43 before surgery and 80 at final follow-up. Disease duration of RA up to the TEA of < 15 years and a pre-operative range of movement (ROM) of > 85° were significant risk factors for revision or aseptic loosening.
Although Kudo type-5 prostheses gave satisfactory results in the short-term, aseptic loosening increased after five years. In most cases, elbow function was maintained in the long-term without loosening of the implant. A short duration from the onset of RA to TEA and a large pre-operative ROM were significant risk factors for revision or aseptic loosening. Cite this article: 2017;99-B:818-23.
我们评估了类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者使用久度5型肘关节假体的长期(超过十年)疗效。
我们回顾性分析了1994年至2003年间接受久度5型全肘关节置换术(TEA)且随访超过十年的31例RA患者的41个肘关节(拉森分级IV级,n = 21;V级,n = 20)。所有患者的肱骨假体均为非骨水泥型,尺骨假体为全聚乙烯骨水泥型。使用梅奥肘关节功能评分评估临床疗效。我们计算了翻修率并评估了翻修的潜在风险因素。平均随访时间为141个月(120至203个月)。
11个肘关节出现尺骨假体无菌性松动。肱骨假体周围均未见透亮区。发生1例深部感染。根据Kaplan-Meier生存分析,五年后的生存率为87.8%,十年后的生存率为70.7%。术前伸展/屈曲范围平均为-38°(-80°至0°)/105°(30°至150°),末次随访时为-40°(-70°至-20°)/132°(100°至150°),而术前梅奥肘关节功能评分平均为43分,末次随访时为80分。RA至TEA的病程<15年以及术前活动范围(ROM)>85°是翻修或无菌性松动的显著风险因素。
尽管久度5型假体在短期内取得了满意的效果,但五年后无菌性松动有所增加。在大多数情况下,长期肘关节功能得以维持,假体未发生松动。RA发病至TEA的时间较短以及术前ROM较大是翻修或无菌性松动的显著风险因素。引用本文:2017;99-B:818 - 23。