• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小麦全生物对土壤含水量降低的宏转录组反应。

Metatranscriptomic response of the wheat holobiont to decreasing soil water content.

作者信息

Pande Pranav M, Azarbad Hamed, Tremblay Julien, St-Arnaud Marc, Yergeau Etienne

机构信息

Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Laval, Québec, H7V 1B7, Canada.

Department of Biology, Evolutionary Ecology of Plants, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

ISME Commun. 2023 Apr 15;3(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s43705-023-00235-7.

DOI:10.1038/s43705-023-00235-7
PMID:37061589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10105728/
Abstract

Crops associate with microorganisms that help their resistance to biotic stress. However, it is not clear how the different partners of this association react during exposure to stress. This knowledge is needed to target the right partners when trying to adapt crops to climate change. Here, we grew wheat in the field under rainout shelters that let through 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of the precipitation. At the peak of the growing season, we sampled plant roots and rhizosphere, and extracted and sequenced their RNA. We compared the 100% and the 25% treatments using differential abundance analysis. In the roots, most of the differentially abundant (DA) transcripts belonged to the fungi, and most were more abundant in the 25% precipitation treatment. About 10% of the DA transcripts belonged to the plant and most were less abundant in the 25% precipitation treatment. In the rhizosphere, most of the DA transcripts belonged to the bacteria and were generally more abundant in the 25% precipitation treatment. Taken together, our results show that the transcriptomic response of the wheat holobiont to decreasing precipitation levels is stronger for the fungal and bacterial partners than for the plant.

摘要

作物与有助于其抵抗生物胁迫的微生物相关联。然而,尚不清楚这种关联中的不同伙伴在受到胁迫时会如何反应。在试图使作物适应气候变化时,需要这些知识来确定合适的伙伴。在这里,我们在防雨棚下的田间种植小麦,防雨棚分别能让100%、75%、50%和25%的降水通过。在生长季节的高峰期,我们采集了植物根系和根际样本,并提取和测序了它们的RNA。我们使用差异丰度分析比较了100%和25%处理组。在根系中,大多数差异丰度(DA)转录本属于真菌,且大多数在25%降水处理组中更为丰富。约10%的DA转录本属于植物,且大多数在25%降水处理组中丰度较低。在根际中,大多数DA转录本属于细菌,且通常在25%降水处理组中更为丰富。综合来看,我们的结果表明,小麦整体生物对降水水平降低的转录组反应,真菌和细菌伙伴比植物更强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/d814160680f8/43705_2023_235_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/7e424656b7c0/43705_2023_235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/35cc51858d2f/43705_2023_235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/19d5ee160808/43705_2023_235_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/c9e445e28c40/43705_2023_235_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/d6a3b684cefc/43705_2023_235_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/d814160680f8/43705_2023_235_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/7e424656b7c0/43705_2023_235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/35cc51858d2f/43705_2023_235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/19d5ee160808/43705_2023_235_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/c9e445e28c40/43705_2023_235_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/d6a3b684cefc/43705_2023_235_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c30/10105728/d814160680f8/43705_2023_235_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Metatranscriptomic response of the wheat holobiont to decreasing soil water content.小麦全生物对土壤含水量降低的宏转录组反应。
ISME Commun. 2023 Apr 15;3(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s43705-023-00235-7.
2
A Drying-Rewetting Cycle Imposes More Important Shifts on Soil Microbial Communities than Does Reduced Precipitation.干湿循环比减少降水对土壤微生物群落的影响更大。
mSystems. 2022 Aug 30;7(4):e0024722. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00247-22. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
The resistance of the wheat microbial community to water stress is more influenced by plant compartment than reduced water availability.小麦微生物群落对水分胁迫的抗性更多地受植物隔室的影响,而不是受水分可用性降低的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Dec 4;97(12). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab149.
4
Root-associated microbiomes of wheat under the combined effect of plant development and nitrogen fertilization.植物发育和氮施肥联合作用下小麦根相关微生物组。
Microbiome. 2019 Oct 22;7(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0750-2.
5
A water stress-adapted inoculum affects rhizosphere fungi, but not bacteria nor wheat.水胁迫适应接种体影响根际真菌,但不影响细菌和小麦。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Jul 1;95(7). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz080.
6
The Rhizosphere Responds: Rich Fen Peat and Root Microbial Ecology after Long-Term Water Table Manipulation.根际响应:长期水位操纵后富营养化泥炭地和根系微生物生态。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 May 26;87(12):e0024121. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00241-21.
7
Four decades of soil water stress history together with host genotype constrain the response of the wheat microbiome to soil moisture.四十年来的土壤水分胁迫史和宿主基因型共同限制了小麦微生物组对土壤水分的响应。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Jul 1;96(7). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa098.
8
Differential Responses of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities to Long-Term Fertilization in the Wheat Rhizosphere and Root Endosphere.丛枝菌根真菌群落对小麦根际和根内长期施肥的差异响应。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Aug 11;87(17):e0034921. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00349-21.
9
Heavy metal-immobilizing bacteria combined with calcium polypeptides reduced the uptake of Cd in wheat and shifted the rhizosphere bacterial communities.重金属固定细菌与钙多肽结合降低了小麦对 Cd 的吸收,并改变了根际细菌群落。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Dec;267:115432. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115432. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Rhizosphere plant-microbe interactions under water stress.水胁迫下根际植物-微生物相互作用。
Adv Appl Microbiol. 2021;115:65-113. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
SegFinder: an automated tool for identifying complete RNA virus genome segments through co-occurrence in multiple sequenced samples.SegFinder:一种通过在多个测序样本中共现来识别完整RNA病毒基因组片段的自动化工具。
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Jul 2;26(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf358.
2
Potential mode of action of multispecies inoculums on wheat growth under water stress.多物种接种物在水分胁迫下对小麦生长的潜在作用模式。
ISME Commun. 2025 Jun 9;5(1):ycaf095. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf095. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Hormonal and transcriptomic regulation of drought adaptation in barley roots and leaves.

本文引用的文献

1
Down-regulation of the bacterial protein biosynthesis machinery in response to weeks, years, and decades of soil warming.响应数周、数年和数十年的土壤升温,细菌蛋白质生物合成机制的下调。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 25;8(12):eabm3230. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm3230.
2
Relative and Quantitative Rhizosphere Microbiome Profiling Results in Distinct Abundance Patterns.相对和定量根际微生物组分析结果呈现出不同的丰度模式。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 24;12:798023. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.798023. eCollection 2021.
3
The resistance of the wheat microbial community to water stress is more influenced by plant compartment than reduced water availability.
大麦根和叶干旱适应性的激素与转录组调控
Sci Rep. 2025 May 11;15(1):16368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01590-2.
4
Microbial survival strategies in desiccated roots of ..干燥根部中的微生物生存策略
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1560114. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1560114. eCollection 2025.
5
Intermittent water stress favors microbial traits that better help wheat under drought.间歇性水分胁迫有利于那些能在干旱条件下更好地帮助小麦的微生物特性。
ISME Commun. 2024 May 20;4(1):ycae074. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae074. eCollection 2024 Jan.
小麦微生物群落对水分胁迫的抗性更多地受植物隔室的影响,而不是受水分可用性降低的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Dec 4;97(12). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab149.
4
Engineering the plant microbiota in the context of the theory of ecological communities.在生态群落理论的背景下对植物微生物组进行工程设计。
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021 Aug;70:220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Four decades of soil water stress history together with host genotype constrain the response of the wheat microbiome to soil moisture.四十年来的土壤水分胁迫史和宿主基因型共同限制了小麦微生物组对土壤水分的响应。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Jul 1;96(7). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa098.
6
Plant root exudation under drought: implications for ecosystem functioning.干旱条件下植物根系分泌物:对生态系统功能的影响
New Phytol. 2020 Mar;225(5):1899-1905. doi: 10.1111/nph.16223. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
7
Comparative Physiological and Metabolic Analysis Reveals a Complex Mechanism Involved in Drought Tolerance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Induced by PGPR and PGRs.比较生理和代谢分析揭示了 PGPR 和 PGR 诱导鹰嘴豆耐旱性中的复杂机制。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2097. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38702-8.
8
Drought Legacy Effects on the Composition of Soil Fungal and Prokaryote Communities.干旱遗留效应对土壤真菌和原核生物群落组成的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Mar 7;9:294. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00294. eCollection 2018.
9
Trees, fungi and bacteria: tripartite metatranscriptomics of a root microbiome responding to soil contamination.树木、真菌和细菌:响应土壤污染的根微生物组的三分体宏转录组学。
Microbiome. 2018 Mar 21;6(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0432-5.
10
Protection of Pepper Plants from Drought by sp. 3J1 by Modulation of the Plant's Glutamine and α-ketoglutarate Content: A Comparative Metabolomics Approach.通过sp. 3J1调节植物谷氨酰胺和α-酮戊二酸含量对辣椒植株的干旱保护作用:一种比较代谢组学方法
Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;9:284. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00284. eCollection 2018.