• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验知识:从哲学辩论到医疗实践?

Experiential knowledge: From philosophical debate to health care practice?

机构信息

Institute for Philosophy II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Oct;29(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1111/jep.13845. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1111/jep.13845
PMID:37062858
Abstract

Despite experience-based expertise being increasingly common in health care, what experiential knowledge consists of remains a topic for debate. Here I propose a philosophical approach to clarify experiential knowledge, drawing on an analogous debate in philosophy of mind, which similarly targets the intuition that experience may generate unique knowledge. I outline the philosophical debate and explicate some relevant ideas for health care, so as to (a) evaluate whether and to what extent this analogous debate is helpful, and (b) supplement existing ideas on experiential knowledge with a philosophical analysis.

摘要

尽管基于经验的专业知识在医疗保健中越来越普遍,但经验知识的构成仍然是一个争论的话题。在这里,我提出了一种哲学方法来澄清经验知识,借鉴了哲学中类似的关于经验是否可能产生独特知识的争论。我概述了哲学争论,并阐述了一些与医疗保健相关的观点,以便(a)评估这种类似的争论在多大程度上是有帮助的,以及(b)用哲学分析来补充关于经验知识的现有观点。

相似文献

1
Experiential knowledge: From philosophical debate to health care practice?经验知识:从哲学辩论到医疗实践?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Oct;29(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1111/jep.13845. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
Philosophy, medicine and healthcare: insights from the Italian experience.哲学、医学与医疗保健:来自意大利经验的见解
Health Care Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):223-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0208-1.
3
Philosophical health: Unveiling the patient's personal philosophy with a person-centred method of dialogue.哲学健康:用以人为中心的对话方法揭示患者的个人哲学。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Oct;29(7):1161-1170. doi: 10.1111/jep.13871. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: a test of the expertise defense.专家判断中关于自由意志和道德责任的持续偏见:专业知识辩护的检验。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1722-31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 18.
5
The future of philosophy.哲学的未来。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 29;354(1392):2069-80. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0544.
6
Luce Irigaray's Philosophy of the Child and Philosophical Thinking for a New Era.露西·伊利加雷的儿童哲学与新时代的哲学思考。
Sophia. 2022;61(1):203-218. doi: 10.1007/s11841-022-00920-5. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Social value judgments in healthcare: a philosophical critique.医疗保健中的社会价值判断:哲学批判。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):317-30. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238963.
8
Not Esoteric, Just Fallible: Comment on Starmans and Friedman About Philosophical Expertise.并非神秘,只是易犯错:评 Starmans 和 Friedman 论哲学专长。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;44(10):e12896. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12896.
9
Defining patient's experiential knowledge: Who, what and how patients know. A narrative critical review.定义患者的体验性知识:患者知道什么、如何知道以及知道谁。叙事性批判性回顾。
Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Feb;45(2):405-422. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13588. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
10
Integrating lived experience into clinical practice: a case study of young peer providers in pediatric rehabilitation.将生活体验融入临床实践:儿科康复中年轻同伴提供者的案例研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(23):7246-7254. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1988735. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Being in a position to know: attuned responsiveness as the hallmark of experiential knowledge and expertise in mental healthcare.能够知晓:调适性反应作为心理保健中经验性知识与专业技能的标志。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;15:1490489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1490489. eCollection 2024.