• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能够知晓:调适性反应作为心理保健中经验性知识与专业技能的标志。

Being in a position to know: attuned responsiveness as the hallmark of experiential knowledge and expertise in mental healthcare.

作者信息

Dings Roy, Strijbos Derek W

机构信息

Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;15:1490489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1490489. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1490489
PMID:39872434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11770679/
Abstract

Inclusion of people with lived experience into various mental healthcare settings is rapidly increasing. In this article we explicate and address two challenges that hinder this development. First, a descriptive challenge: what is the unique and complementary epistemic contribution of people with lived experience in mental healthcare, precisely? Second, a normative challenge: how to evaluate these contributions of people with lived experience to mental healthcare? To address these challenges, we propose a novel conceptual 'lens' through which to understand the epistemic contributions of people with lived experience. Our approach diverges from the orthodox view by not construing these contributions in terms of (experiential) knowledge, but in terms of perceptual and agential skills which put people with lived experience in a unique 'position to know'. More specifically, we reckon that such contributions are best understood in terms of what we call 'responsiveness' and 'attunement'. The main goal of this paper is to show how the 'Attuned Responsiveness'-Framework allows us to satisfactorily address the descriptive and normative challenge, thereby providing the practice of expertise-by-experience in mental healthcare with a more solid conceptual basis.

摘要

将有实际生活经验的人纳入各种精神卫生保健环境的情况正在迅速增加。在本文中,我们阐述并应对阻碍这一发展的两个挑战。第一,一个描述性挑战:有实际生活经验的人在精神卫生保健中独特且互补的认知贡献究竟是什么?第二,一个规范性挑战:如何评估有实际生活经验的人对精神卫生保健的这些贡献?为应对这些挑战,我们提出一种新颖的概念“透镜”,通过它来理解有实际生活经验的人的认知贡献。我们的方法与正统观点不同,不是从(经验性)知识的角度来解释这些贡献,而是从感知和能动技能的角度,这些技能使有实际生活经验的人处于独特的“认知位置”。更具体地说,我们认为这种贡献最好从我们所说的“响应性”和“协调性”的角度来理解。本文的主要目标是展示“协调响应性”框架如何使我们能够令人满意地应对描述性和规范性挑战,从而为精神卫生保健中基于经验的专业实践提供更坚实的概念基础。

相似文献

1
Being in a position to know: attuned responsiveness as the hallmark of experiential knowledge and expertise in mental healthcare.能够知晓:调适性反应作为心理保健中经验性知识与专业技能的标志。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;15:1490489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1490489. eCollection 2024.
2
Epistemic injustice and mental health research: A pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise.认知不公正与心理健康研究:一种运用生活经验专业知识的务实方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 28;14:1114725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1114725. eCollection 2023.
3
The use of experiential knowledge in the role of a psychiatrist.经验性知识在精神科医生角色中的应用。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 15;14:1163804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1163804. eCollection 2023.
4
'Keeping it real': A qualitative exploration of preferences of people with lived experience for participation and active involvement in mental health research in Australia.“保持真实”:澳大利亚有过精神健康问题经历的人对参与和积极投入精神健康研究的偏好的定性探索。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13934. doi: 10.1111/hex.13934.
5
Mental health and lived experience: The value of lived experience expertise in global mental health.心理健康与生活经历:生活经历专业知识在全球心理健康中的价值。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Jun 15;10:e38. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.24. eCollection 2023.
6
Something special, something unique: Perspectives of experts by experience in mental health nursing education on their contribution.特别的东西,独一无二的东西:精神健康护理教育中经验专家对其贡献的看法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;29(2):346-358. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12773. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.
8
Knowledge and expertise in care practices: the role of the peer worker in mental health teams.护理实践知识和专长:同伴工作者在精神卫生团队中的作用。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Sep;41(7):1305-1322. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12944. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Understanding the identity of lived experience researchers and providers: a conceptual framework and systematic narrative review.了解生活经验研究者和提供者的身份:一个概念框架和系统的叙述性综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 24;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00439-0.
10
"See Me as Human:" Reflections on an Experiential Curriculum Led by People With Lived Experience of Incarceration.“视我为人”:对由有监禁经历者主导的体验式课程的反思
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jan 17;12:23821205241300943. doi: 10.1177/23821205241300943. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary: Essential elements that contribute to the recovery of persons with severe mental illness: a systematic scoping study.评论:有助于重度精神疾病患者康复的关键要素:一项系统的范围界定研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 21;16:1563684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1563684. eCollection 2025.
2
Commentary: Dignity of older persons with mental health conditions: why should clinicians care?评论:患有精神疾病的老年人的尊严:临床医生为何应予以关注?
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 3;16:1553697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1553697. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The Involvement of Service Users and People With Lived Experience in Mental Health Care Innovation Through Design: Systematic Review.通过设计让服务使用者和有亲身经历者参与精神卫生保健创新:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jul 25;10:e46590. doi: 10.2196/46590.
2
Experiential knowledge: From philosophical debate to health care practice?经验知识:从哲学辩论到医疗实践?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Oct;29(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1111/jep.13845. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
3
'Deep brain stimulation is no ON/OFF-switch': an ethnography of clinical expertise in psychiatric practice.“深部脑刺激并非开关式疗法”:精神科临床实践中专业技能的人种志研究
Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2023;22(1):129-148. doi: 10.1007/s11097-021-09732-3. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Defining patient's experiential knowledge: Who, what and how patients know. A narrative critical review.定义患者的体验性知识:患者知道什么、如何知道以及知道谁。叙事性批判性回顾。
Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Feb;45(2):405-422. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13588. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
New perspectives on person-centered care: an affordance-based account.以患者为中心的护理新视角:基于可供性的阐述。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):631-644. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09977-w. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
6
How much 'lived experience' is enough? Understanding mental health lived experience work from a management perspective.多少“生活经验”是足够的?从管理角度理解心理健康生活经验工作。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Dec;44(6):898-903. doi: 10.1071/AH19261.
7
Measuring the impact of participatory research in psychiatry: How the search for epistemic justifications obscures ethical considerations.衡量精神病学参与式研究的影响:寻找认识论理由如何掩盖伦理考虑。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/hex.12988. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
Phenomenology in nursing studies: New perspectives.护理研究中的现象学:新视角。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 May;93:155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
The role of the peer specialists: Unanswered questions.同伴专家的角色:未解答的问题。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016 Sep;39(3):289-91. doi: 10.1037/prj0000216.
10
What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories.患者参与项目中的“患者视角”是什么?隐含逻辑及与女性主义理论的相似之处。
Health (London). 2017 Jan;21(1):76-92. doi: 10.1177/1363459316644494. Epub 2016 Jul 24.