• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童的亲社会说谎行为:种族背景、父母因素以及对同伴的预期后果的影响

Prosocial lie-telling in preschoolers: The impacts of ethnic background, parental factors, and perceived consequence for the partner.

作者信息

Dobrin-De Grace Roksana, Ma Lili

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1128685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128685. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128685
PMID:37063578
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10098184/
Abstract

This study explored prosocial lie-telling behavior in 4- to 5-year-old children from two ethnic groups: European Canadian ( = 49; excluding Eastern European Canadian) and Chinese Canadian ( = 45). Children completed an online experiment involving two real-life politeness situations. In the first situation, children were asked whether they thought someone with a red mark on their face looked okay for a photo or a Zoom party (Reverse Rouge Task). In the second situation, upon hearing the researcher's misconception about two pieces of artwork, children were asked whether they agreed with the researcher (Art Rating Task). Parents completed questionnaires that measured their levels of collectivist orientation and parenting styles. Contrary to our hypotheses, the likelihood of children telling a prosocial lie did not vary as a function of their ethnic group or the presence of a perceived consequence for the partner, nor was it predicated by parental collectivist orientation. Interestingly, prosocial liars were more likely to have authoritative parents, whereas blunt-truth tellers were more likely to have permissive parents. These findings have important implications for the ways in which certain parenting styles influence the socialization of positive politeness in children. In addition, the similar rates of prosocial lying across the two ethnic groups suggest that children who are born and raised in Canada may be much more alike than different in their prosocial lie-telling behavior, despite coming from different ethnic backgrounds.

摘要

本研究探讨了来自两个族群的4至5岁儿童的亲社会说谎行为:欧裔加拿大儿童(n = 49;不包括东欧裔加拿大儿童)和华裔加拿大儿童(n = 45)。孩子们完成了一项在线实验,其中涉及两种现实生活中的礼貌情境。在第一种情境中,孩子们被问到他们是否认为脸上有红色印记的人拍照片或参加视频通话派对时看起来没问题(反向胭脂任务)。在第二种情境中,听到研究人员对两件艺术品的错误看法后,孩子们被问到他们是否同意研究人员的看法(艺术评分任务)。家长们完成了测量他们集体主义取向水平和育儿方式的问卷。与我们的假设相反,孩子们说出亲社会谎言的可能性并不因他们的族群或对同伴是否存在可感知后果而有所不同,也不是由父母的集体主义取向所预测的。有趣的是,亲社会说谎者更有可能有权威型父母,而直言真相者更有可能有放任型父母。这些发现对于某些育儿方式影响儿童积极礼貌社交化的方式具有重要意义。此外,两个族群亲社会说谎的相似比例表明,在加拿大出生和长大的儿童,尽管来自不同的族群背景,但在亲社会说谎行为方面可能更多的是相似而非不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ac/10098184/fd5e69fb5d67/fpsyg-14-1128685-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ac/10098184/919e00700438/fpsyg-14-1128685-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ac/10098184/fd5e69fb5d67/fpsyg-14-1128685-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ac/10098184/919e00700438/fpsyg-14-1128685-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ac/10098184/fd5e69fb5d67/fpsyg-14-1128685-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prosocial lie-telling in preschoolers: The impacts of ethnic background, parental factors, and perceived consequence for the partner.学龄前儿童的亲社会说谎行为:种族背景、父母因素以及对同伴的预期后果的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1128685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128685. eCollection 2023.
2
Predictors of children's prosocial lie-telling: Motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding.儿童亲社会说谎的预测因素:动机、社会化变量和道德理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):373-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
3
Chinese and Canadian Children's Evaluations of Lying and Truth Telling: Similarities and Dfferences in the Context of pro-and Antisocial Behaviors.中国和加拿大儿童对说谎与讲真话的评价:亲社会和反社会行为背景下的异同
Child Dev. 1997 Oct;68(5):924-934. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01971.x.
4
Perceptions of Dishonesty: Understanding Parents' Reports of and Influence on Children and Adolescents' Lie-Telling.欺骗行为的认知:理解父母对儿童和青少年说谎行为的报告和影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jan;49(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01153-5. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
5
Children's Reasoning about Lie-telling and Truth-telling in Politeness Contexts.儿童在礼貌情境中对说谎与说实话的推理。
Soc Dev. 2009 Aug;18(3):728-746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00495.x.
6
Carving Pinocchio: Longitudinal examination of children's lying for different goals.《雕刻皮诺曹:儿童为不同目的说谎的纵向研究》
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:34-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
7
Advanced theory of mind and children's prosocial lie-telling in middle childhood: A training study.高级心理理论与儿童中期的亲社会说谎行为:一项训练研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Oct;246:106012. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106012. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
8
Parental Collectivism Goals and Chinese Adolescents' Prosocial Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Authoritative Parenting.父母集体主义目标与中国青少年的亲社会行为:权威型教养方式的中介作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Apr;51(4):766-779. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01579-4. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
9
Chinese children's evaluations of white lies: weighing the consequences for recipients.中国儿童对善意谎言的评价:权衡对接受者的后果。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):308-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
10
Lying and truth-telling in children: from concept to action.儿童说谎与说真话:从概念到行为。
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):581-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01417.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of prosocial risk-taking behavior: Mechanisms and opportunities.亲社会冒险行为的发展:机制与机遇。
Child Dev Perspect. 2025 Jun;19(2):63-71. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12525. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Prosocial lies: Causes and consequences.亲社会谎言:成因与后果
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:335-340. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
2
When guiding principles do not guide: The moderating effects of cultural tightness on value-behavior links.当指导原则不起指导作用时:文化严谨性对价值观-行为关系的调节作用。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):325-337. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12584. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Young Children Selectively Hide the Truth About Sensitive Topics.幼儿会有选择地隐瞒敏感话题的真相。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;44(3):e12824. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12824.
4
Chinese and Canadian Children's Evaluations of Lying and Truth Telling: Similarities and Dfferences in the Context of pro-and Antisocial Behaviors.中国和加拿大儿童对说谎与讲真话的评价:亲社会和反社会行为背景下的异同
Child Dev. 1997 Oct;68(5):924-934. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01971.x.
5
Children tell white lies to make others feel better.孩子们会撒善意的谎言以使他人感觉更好。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Sep;33(3):259-70. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12083. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
6
Japanese and American children's moral evaluations of reporting on transgressions.日本和美国儿童对举报违规行为的道德评价。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1520-31. doi: 10.1037/a0035993. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
7
Development of children's moral evaluations of modesty and self-promotion in diverse cultural settings.儿童在不同文化背景下对谦逊和自我推销的道德评价的发展。
J Moral Educ. 2012 Jan 11;41(1):61-78. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2011.617414.
8
Predictors of children's prosocial lie-telling: Motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding.儿童亲社会说谎的预测因素:动机、社会化变量和道德理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):373-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
9
Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.紧密文化和松散文化的差异:一项 33 国研究。
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1197754.
10
Chinese Children's Moral Evaluation of Lies and Truths-Roles of Context and Parental Individualism-Collectivism Tendencies.中国儿童对谎言与真相的道德评价——情境及父母个人主义-集体主义倾向的作用
Infant Child Dev. 2010 Oct;19(5):498-515. doi: 10.1002/icd.680.