Halvorsen Kristin C, Marx Robert G, Wolfe Isabel, Taber Caroline, Jivanelli Bridget, Pearle Andrew D, Ling Daphne I
Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
HSS J. 2023 May;19(2):154-162. doi: 10.1177/15563316221140860. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
Athletes who participate in sports that involve cutting and pivoting movements are particularly susceptible to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Preventing this injury is the best way to combat its health consequences and costs. There may be a dose-response relationship between adherence and injury reduction. : We sought to examine whether athletes' adherence to injury prevention programs (IPPs) is associated with reductions in ACL and lower extremity (LE) injuries. : We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, searching for studies published between 2011 and 2021. Studies were included if they reported on the use of an ACL IPP compared with a control group and recorded the rate of injuries to calculate a rate ratio, as well as adherence to the program as a percentage of sessions performed. For the meta-analysis, the rate ratios were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. : For the 15 studies included (11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies), the random-effects model grouped athletes' adherence to an IPP as high (76% or more of the sessions), moderate (51%-75% of the sessions), and low (50% or fewer of the sessions). We found that athletes with the highest level of IPP adherence had a significantly lower incidence of ACL injury. The rate ratios for moderate and low adherence did not demonstrate a reduced incidence of ACL injury. Injury prevention program participation was also associated with a decrease in LE injury rates. : This systematic review and meta-analysis found that athletes with high adherence to IPPs had reduced rates of ACL and LE injuries. Our findings suggest that educating coaches and athletes on the dose-dependent benefits of IPPs may promote the routine incorporation of these programs into warm-up sessions to decrease the risk of ACL and LE injuries.
参加涉及急停和转身动作的运动项目的运动员特别容易发生前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤。预防这种损伤是对抗其健康后果和成本的最佳方法。依从性与损伤减少之间可能存在剂量反应关系。我们试图研究运动员对损伤预防计划(IPP)的依从性是否与ACL和下肢(LE)损伤的减少有关。我们对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了系统综述,搜索2011年至2021年发表的研究。如果研究报告了与对照组相比使用ACL IPP的情况,并记录损伤率以计算率比,以及将对该计划的依从性作为所执行课程的百分比,则纳入研究。对于荟萃分析,使用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型汇总率比。对于纳入的15项研究(11项随机对照试验和4项队列研究),随机效应模型将运动员对IPP的依从性分为高(76%或更多课程)、中(51%-75%课程)和低(50%或更少课程)。我们发现,IPP依从性最高的运动员ACL损伤发生率显著较低。中度和低度依从性的率比并未显示ACL损伤发生率降低。参与损伤预防计划也与LE损伤率的降低有关。这项系统综述和荟萃分析发现,对IPP依从性高的运动员ACL和LE损伤率降低。我们的研究结果表明,对教练和运动员进行IPP剂量依赖性益处的教育可能会促进将这些计划常规纳入热身环节,以降低ACL和LE损伤的风险。