Crawley Dominic, Saunders Rob, Buckman Joshua E J, Hui Esther, Walker Richard, Dotchin Catherine, Spector Aimee
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK.
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2023 Apr 17;9(3):e69. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.46.
Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is the only non-pharmacological, treatment for dementia recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, following multiple international trials demonstrating beneficial cognitive outcomes in people with mild-to-moderate dementia. However, there is limited understanding of whether treatment prognosis is influenced by sociodemographic and clinical variables (such as dementia subtype and gender), information which could inform clinical decision-making.
We describe the protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis assessing the prognostic factors related to CST. In publishing this protocol, we hope to increase the transparency of our work, and keep healthcare professionals aware of the latest evidence for effective CST.
A systematic review will be conducted with searches of the bibliographic databases Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO, from inception to 7 February 2023. Studies will be included if they are clinical trials of CST, use the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (gold-standard measure of cognition in dementia in clinical trials) and include participants with mild-to-moderate dementia. Following harmonisation of the data-set, mixed-effect models will be constructed to explore the relationship between the prognostic indicators and change scores post-treatment.
This is the first individual patient data meta-analyses on CST, and has the potential to significantly optimise patient care. Previous analyses suggest people with advanced dementia could benefit more from CST treatment. Given that CST is currently used post-diagnosis in people with mild-to-moderate dementia, the implications of confirming this finding, among identifying other prognostic indicators, are profound.
认知刺激疗法(CST)是英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所推荐的唯一一种针对痴呆症的非药物治疗方法,此前多项国际试验表明,该疗法对轻至中度痴呆症患者的认知结果有益。然而,对于治疗预后是否受社会人口统计学和临床变量(如痴呆症亚型和性别)影响的了解有限,而这些信息可为临床决策提供参考。
我们描述了一项系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析的方案,以评估与认知刺激疗法相关的预后因素。通过发布此方案,我们希望提高工作的透明度,并让医疗保健专业人员了解认知刺激疗法有效性的最新证据。
将进行一项系统评价,检索文献数据库Medline、EMBASE和PsycINFO,检索时间从建库至2023年2月7日。如果研究是认知刺激疗法的临床试验,使用阿尔茨海默病评估量表 - 认知分量表(临床试验中痴呆症认知的金标准测量方法),并纳入轻至中度痴呆症患者,则将其纳入研究。在数据集协调一致后,将构建混合效应模型,以探讨预后指标与治疗后变化分数之间的关系。
这是第一项关于认知刺激疗法的个体患者数据荟萃分析,有可能显著优化患者护理。先前的分析表明,晚期痴呆症患者可能从认知刺激疗法治疗中获益更多。鉴于认知刺激疗法目前用于轻至中度痴呆症患者的诊断后治疗,在确定其他预后指标的同时证实这一发现的意义深远。