The Ohio State University (USA).
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain).
Span J Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;26:e4. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2023.7.
Attitude strength (what makes attitudes durable and impactful) has become an important topic in the domain of social influence. We review three areas in which the traditional view of attitude strength has been modified or updated since the publication of Petty and Krosnick's 1995 edited book on the topic. First, although it was widely assumed that there were different categories of strength variables (i.e., operative versus meta-cognitive), it may now be better to recognize that each strength property can be measured both structurally and subjectively and that each measure is useful. Second, although scholars assumed that virtually all persuasion techniques would work better on weaker than stronger attitudes, recent research suggests that some techniques might actually work better on stronger than weaker attitudes. Third, although stronger attitudes often guide behavior better than weaker ones, when strength is challenged or weak attitudes are threatening, people can be motivated to act to demonstrate or restore certainty. This can result in weaker attitudes leading to more extreme behavior.
态度强度(使态度持久和有影响力的因素)已成为社会影响领域的一个重要话题。自 1995 年佩蒂和克罗斯尼克编辑的关于该主题的书籍出版以来,我们回顾了态度强度的传统观点在三个方面发生的变化或更新。首先,尽管人们普遍认为存在不同类别的强度变量(即操作性的和元认知的),但现在可能更好地认识到,每种强度特性都可以在结构上和主观上进行测量,而且每种测量都很有用。其次,尽管学者们假设几乎所有的说服技巧在较弱的态度上比在较强的态度上效果更好,但最近的研究表明,有些技巧实际上在较强的态度上效果更好。第三,尽管较强的态度通常比较弱的态度更好地指导行为,但当强度受到挑战或较弱的态度受到威胁时,人们可能会受到激励去采取行动以展示或恢复确定性。这可能导致较弱的态度导致更极端的行为。