Cai Zhenghua, Yang Yifei, Han Yuqing, Fu Xu, Mao Liang, Qiu Yudong
Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Eur Surg Res. 2023;64(3):334-341. doi: 10.1159/000530634. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
Although the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is the most widely utilized method for quantifying surgical complications, it fails to properly capture all events. To address this, the comprehensive complication index (CCI) was introduced. The purpose of this study was to compare the CCI and CDC as predictors of postoperative length of stay (PLOS) and total hospitalization costs in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Data were collected from February 2018 to February 2021. Complications were graded on the CDC scale and the CCI was calculated for each patient. The correlations between CDC and CCI with PLOS and hospitalization costs were compared. Linear analyses were performed to identify factors associated with PLOS and costs.
291 patients were enrolled with an average age of 61.2 years. 286 of them developed postoperative complications at CDC grade 1 (17.8%), 2 (59.9%), 3a (13.4%), 3b (4.5%), 4 (2.1%), and 5 (0.6%). Median CCI of the study cohort was 30.8. Spearman's correlation analysis showed the CDC and CCI were significantly correlated with PLOS and hospitalization costs, but the CCI showed a stronger correlation with PLOS (+0.552 day of stay for each additional CCI point; CCI: ρ = 0.663 vs. CDC: ρ = 0.581; p = 0.036). There were no significant differences in the correlations between total hospitalization costs and the CDC or CCI (CCI: ρ = 0.566 vs. CDC: ρ = 0.565; p = 0.78).
CCI is an accurate tool for quantifying morbidities after PD and shows a stronger correlation with PLOS compared with the CDC.
尽管Clavien-Dindo分类法(CDC)是量化手术并发症最广泛使用的方法,但它未能全面涵盖所有事件。为解决这一问题,引入了综合并发症指数(CCI)。本研究的目的是比较CCI和CDC作为胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者术后住院时间(PLOS)和总住院费用预测指标的情况。
收集2018年2月至2021年2月的数据。根据CDC量表对并发症进行分级,并为每位患者计算CCI。比较CDC和CCI与PLOS及住院费用之间的相关性。进行线性分析以确定与PLOS和费用相关的因素。
共纳入291例患者,平均年龄61.2岁。其中286例出现术后并发症,CDC分级为1级(17.8%)、2级(59.9%)、3a级(13.4%)、3b级(4.5%)、4级(2.1%)和5级(0.6%)。研究队列的CCI中位数为30.8。Spearman相关性分析显示,CDC和CCI与PLOS及住院费用均显著相关,但CCI与PLOS的相关性更强(每增加1个CCI点,住院时间增加0.552天;CCI:ρ = 0.663,CDC:ρ = 0.581;p = 0.036)。总住院费用与CDC或CCI之间的相关性无显著差异(CCI:ρ = 0.566,CDC:ρ = 0.565;p = 0.78)。
CCI是量化PD术后发病率的准确工具,与CDC相比,它与PLOS的相关性更强。