Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Core Facility Applied Physics, Laser and CAD/CAM Technology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Apr 18;38(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03767-5.
The aim of this study was the evaluation of the in vitro efficacy of a carbon dioxide (CO) laser, a tetracalcium phosphate/dicalcium phosphate anhydrate (TP/DP) desensitizer and the combination of the desensitizer and additional CO laser irradiation as a treatment modality for cervical dentin hypersensitivity. A total of 48 dental specimens, prepared from extracted human premolars and molars, were divided into four groups: a control group, a TP/DP desensitizer paste group, a CO laser (10.600-nm wavelength) group, and a paste and laser group. The specimens were coated with nail varnish except in the marked area and were then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 1 h. The specimens were then washed, dried, and cut longitudinally. Thereafter, photos of 40 dentin specimens were taken and evaluated. The area of penetration was assessed and reported as percentage of the dentin surface area. Additionally eight dental specimens were examined with the aid of a scanning electron microscope and evaluated. Significant differences in the penetration depth were found for all experimental groups compared to the control group. The lowest penetration area was detected in the paste-laser group (16.5%), followed by the laser (23.7%), the paste (48.5%), and the control group (86.2%). The combined treatment of the CO laser and a TP/DP desensitizer was efficient in sealing the dentinal surface and could be a treatment option for cervical dentin hypersensitivity.
本研究旨在评估二氧化碳(CO)激光、四钙磷酸钙/二水磷酸钙(TP/DP)脱敏剂以及脱敏剂与额外 CO 激光照射相结合作为治疗牙本质过敏症的方法的体外疗效。共 48 个牙标本取自离体人前磨牙和磨牙,分为四组:对照组、TP/DP 脱敏剂糊剂组、CO 激光(10.600nm 波长)组和糊剂加激光组。除标记区域外,所有标本均用指甲油覆盖,然后浸入 2%亚甲蓝染料中 1 小时。然后冲洗、干燥并沿纵向切割标本。之后,拍摄 40 个牙本质标本的照片并进行评估。评估和报告渗透面积占牙本质表面积的百分比。此外,还借助扫描电子显微镜检查了 8 个牙标本并进行了评估。与对照组相比,所有实验组的渗透深度均有显著差异。糊剂-激光组的渗透面积最低(16.5%),其次是激光组(23.7%)、糊剂组(48.5%)和对照组(86.2%)。CO 激光和 TP/DP 脱敏剂的联合治疗能够有效地封闭牙本质表面,可能是治疗牙本质过敏症的一种选择。