Suppr超能文献

个体对减少肉类消费以缓解气候变化的看法:系统评价方案。

Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany

Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):e071122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes to climate change. Therefore, climate protection, besides health or animal welfare, could motivate individuals to eat less meat. Willingness to reduce meat consumption and motives to do so are not yet fully understood.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extended guidelines, a scoping review of peer-reviewed original studies will be conducted to address three questions: What is the evidence regarding (1) the willingness of individuals to reduce meat consumption to mitigate climate change, (2) the awareness of individuals about the link between their meat consumption and the potential to mitigate climate change and (3) individuals having reduced meat consumption for the reason of climate protection? We will search the databases Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Greenfile (via Ebsco) and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris (via Livivo) using a systematic search string. Studies from 2015 onwards, published in English, German, Danish or Dutch, will be included. We will include observational studies, qualitative studies, intervention studies (if they include surveys) and reviews. Data will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, comprising methods, population characteristics, meat type under study, indicators measured and limitations. Key findings will be grouped according to the research questions. This scoping review will help clarify the role of climate protection in individual reduction of meat consumption and identify research gaps in this field.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. Findings of this scoping review will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85.

摘要

简介

大量食用红色肉类和加工肉类会增加罹患多种慢性疾病的风险。许多人,尤其是高收入国家的人,摄入的肉类超过了营养和健康机构的建议量。肉类生产也对环境造成负面影响,并导致气候变化。因此,除了健康或动物福利之外,气候保护也可能促使个人减少肉类消费。个人减少肉类消费的意愿和动机尚未得到充分理解。

方法和分析

根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)扩展指南,将对同行评议的原始研究进行范围综述,以解决三个问题:(1)个人减少肉类消费以减轻气候变化的意愿的证据,(2)个人对其肉类消费与减轻气候变化潜力之间联系的认识,以及(3)个人出于气候保护原因减少肉类消费的情况。我们将使用系统搜索字符串在 Medline(通过 PubMed)、Scopus、Embase、Greenfile(通过 Ebsco)和 PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris(通过 Livivo)数据库中进行搜索。纳入 2015 年以后发表的英文、德文、丹麦文或荷兰文的观察性研究、定性研究、干预研究(如果它们包括调查)和综述。将使用叙述性综合方法汇总数据,包括方法、人口特征、研究中的肉类类型、测量的指标和局限性。关键发现将根据研究问题进行分组。这项范围综述将有助于阐明气候保护在个人减少肉类消费中的作用,并确定该领域的研究空白。

伦理和传播

本研究不要求正式的伦理批准,因为不会在本研究中收集原始数据。该范围综述的结果将在科学会议上展示,并在同行评议的期刊上发表。

注册号

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85。

相似文献

3
Exploring the effects of climate change on child malnutrition: protocol for a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e090285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090285.
6
Impact of urban greening on population health in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e087638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087638.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Meat consumption among different social groups and specific options for reducing it: a literature review of empirical research.
Front Sociol. 2025 May 23;10:1547663. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1547663. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Plant-based diets and long-term health: findings from the EPIC-Oxford study.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2022 May;81(2):190-198. doi: 10.1017/S0029665121003748. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Willingness to replace animal-based products with pulses among consumers in different European countries.
Food Res Int. 2022 Jul;157:111403. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111403. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Towards reduced meat consumption: A systematic literature review of intervention effectiveness, 2001-2019.
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105739. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105739. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
4
Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers.
Appetite. 2021 Dec 1;167:105643. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105643. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
Motivations, barriers, and strategies for meat reduction at different family lifecycle stages.
Appetite. 2020 Jul 1;150:104644. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104644. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
6
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
7
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
"Zweckoptimismus" and the Paris process will not save the world from climate catastrophe.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Mar;14(2):198-201. doi: 10.1002/ieam.2015.
10
Towards a reduced meat diet: Mindset and motivation of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters.
Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验