• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯利雅得法赫德国王医疗城患者中机器人全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术的术后疼痛与功能比较

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Function in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Amongst Patients at King Fahad Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Alshatwi Razan, Alfadhel Shoog, Alrasheed Mohammed, Alhakbani Abdulaziz, AlShaya Osama

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

Orthopaedic Surgery, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36285. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.36285
PMID:37073178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10105976/
Abstract

Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the definitive surgical treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis and has been proven to relieve pain and improve function. With the rise in demand and the number of TKA procedures every year, more studies have been conducted on robotic TKA. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the postoperative pain between robotic and conventional TKA and the postoperative functional level between robotic and conventional TKA. Method This is a quantitative, observational, prospective study conducted from February 2022 to August 2022 amongst patients in the orthopaedic department of King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who have undergone primary TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis using robotic TKA and conventional TKA. After applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria, a total of 26 patients (12 robotic and 14 conventional) were included in the study. The patients were assessed at three time points: two weeks, six weeks, and three months post-op. They were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the visual analogue scores (VAS) used to assess pain. Result A total of 26 patients were included in this research. The patients were divided into two groups: 12 robotic TKA patients and 14 conventional TKA patients. In this study, while comparing patients who underwent robotic TKA with those who underwent conventional TKA, no statistical significance was found regarding pain and function at all stages postoperatively. Conclusion There was no short-term difference between robotic and conventional TKA regarding pain and function. There is a need for further extensive research on robotic TKA in terms of cost-effectiveness, complications, implant survivorship, and long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景 全膝关节置换术(TKA)是终末期骨关节炎的确定性手术治疗方法,已被证明可缓解疼痛并改善功能。随着每年TKA手术需求和数量的增加,关于机器人辅助TKA的研究也越来越多。目的 本研究的目的是比较机器人辅助TKA与传统TKA术后的疼痛情况以及术后功能水平。方法 这是一项定量、观察性、前瞻性研究,于2022年2月至2022年8月在沙特阿拉伯利雅得法赫德国王医疗城骨科接受终末期骨关节炎初次TKA手术的患者中进行,采用机器人辅助TKA和传统TKA。应用排除和纳入标准后,共有26例患者(12例机器人辅助组和14例传统组)纳入研究。在术后两周、六周和三个月三个时间点对患者进行评估。使用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分以及用于评估疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。结果 本研究共纳入26例患者。患者分为两组:12例机器人辅助TKA患者和14例传统TKA患者。在本研究中,比较接受机器人辅助TKA的患者与接受传统TKA的患者时,术后各阶段的疼痛和功能均未发现统计学差异。结论 机器人辅助TKA与传统TKA在疼痛和功能方面无短期差异。需要在成本效益、并发症、植入物生存率和长期结果方面对机器人辅助TKA进行进一步广泛研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7770/10105976/036d6833960c/cureus-0015-00000036285-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7770/10105976/036d6833960c/cureus-0015-00000036285-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7770/10105976/036d6833960c/cureus-0015-00000036285-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Function in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Amongst Patients at King Fahad Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得法赫德国王医疗城患者中机器人全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术的术后疼痛与功能比较
Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36285. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
[A prospective randomized controlled trial on the short-term effectiveness of domestic robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty].[国产机器人辅助全膝关节置换术短期疗效的前瞻性随机对照试验]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 15;35(10):1251-1258. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202106047.
3
Results of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty at 2-Year Follow-up.机器人辅助与手工全膝关节置换术2年随访结果。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(2):159-166. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731349. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
4
Functional outcomes in patient specific instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty; a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.患者特异性器械与常规器械在全膝关节置换术中的功能结果:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 23;23(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05620-2.
5
HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment - A prospective randomized and multicenter study.HURWA机器人辅助全膝关节置换术可改善假体位置和对线——一项前瞻性随机多中心研究。
J Orthop Translat. 2022 Feb 16;33:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.12.004. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to similar 24-month WOMAC scores as compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.无影像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术相比,24 个月时 WOMAC 评分相似:一项回顾性队列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2631-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06599-4. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study.机器人辅助与传统手动全膝关节置换术的早期临床和影像学结果:一项随机对照研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):1972-1980. doi: 10.1111/os.13323. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
8
Comparison of serum inflammatory indicators and radiographic results in MAKO robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of Chinese patients.比较 MAKO 机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术治疗膝骨关节炎的血清炎症指标和影像学结果:一项中国患者的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 4;23(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05373-y.
9
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统基于夹具的全膝关节置换术相比,可改善早期功能恢复并减少住院时间:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):930-937. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1.
10
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Conventional Versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.传统全膝关节置换术与机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46845. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46845. eCollection 2023 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Muscle Activation and Mobility After Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Insights from Early Postoperative Recovery.机器人全膝关节置换术后的肌肉激活与活动度:术后早期恢复的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 May 1;14(9):3150. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093150.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277980. eCollection 2022.
2
Inflammatory Response in Robotic-Arm-Assisted Versus Conventional Jig-Based TKA and the Correlation with Early Functional Outcomes: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助与传统夹具辅助 TKA 中的炎症反应及其与早期功能结果的相关性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Nov 2;104(21):1905-1914. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00167. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Robotic Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty in High Volume Surgeons: A Comparison of Cost and Quality Metrics.
机器人辅助与手动全膝关节置换术在高量手术医生中的比较:成本和质量指标的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S782-S789. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.018. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain.在全膝关节置换术中使用导航或机器人辅助技术并不能减轻术后疼痛。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Mar;36(4):439-444. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735313. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrates decreased postoperative pain and opioid usage compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.与传统全膝关节置换术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术术后疼痛减轻,阿片类药物使用量减少。
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Oct 27;1(2):8-12. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.12.BJO-2019-0004.R1. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Short-Term Outcomes Are Comparable between Robotic-Arm Assisted and Traditional Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的短期疗效相当。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Jun;35(7):798-803. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718603. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.MAKO CT 基于的机械臂辅助系统是全膝关节置换术的一种可靠方法:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3585-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06283-z. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Computer and robotic - assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes.计算机及机器人辅助全膝关节置换术:疗效综述
J Exp Orthop. 2020 Sep 24;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00278-y.
9
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术相当:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1533-1549. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03512-5. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
10
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床和放射学结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3393-3409.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 11.