• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全膝关节置换术中使用导航或机器人辅助技术并不能减轻术后疼痛。

The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain.

作者信息

Zak Stephen Gerard, Yeroushalmi David, Tang Alex, Meftah Morteza, Schnaser Erik, Schwarzkopf Ran

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York.

Desert Orthopedic Center, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, California.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2023 Mar;36(4):439-444. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735313. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1735313
PMID:34530477
Abstract

The use of intraoperative technology (IT), such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and robot-assisted surgery (RA), in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly popular due to its ability to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiographic outliers. There is disputing evidence as to whether IT leads to better clinical outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of CAN or RA in TKA improves pain outcomes. This is a retrospective review of a multicenter randomized control trial of 327 primary TKAs. Demographics, surgical time, IT use (CAN/RA), length of stay (LOS), and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) were collected. Analysis was done by comparing IT ( = 110) to a conventional TKA cohort ( = 217). When accounting for demographic differences and the use of a tourniquet, the IT cohort had shorter surgical time (88.77 ± 18.57 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53 minutes;  = 0.005). While postoperative day 1 pain scores were similar ( = 0.316), the IT cohort has less opioid consumption at 2 weeks ( = 0.006) and 1 month ( = 0.005) postoperatively, but not at 3 months ( = 0.058). When comparing different types of IT, CAN, and RA, we found that they had similar surgical times ( = 0.610) and pain scores ( = 0.813). Both cohorts had similar opioid consumption at 2 weeks ( = 0.092), 1 month ( = 0.058), and 3 months ( = 0.064) postoperatively. The use of IT in TKA does not yield a clinically significant reduction in pain outcomes. There was also no difference in pain or perioperative outcomes between CAN and RA technology used in TKA.

摘要

在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,诸如计算机辅助导航(CAN)和机器人辅助手术(RA)等术中技术(IT)的应用越来越普遍,因为其能够提高手术精度并减少影像学异常情况。关于IT是否能带来更好的临床效果和减轻术后疼痛,存在有争议的证据。本研究的目的是确定在TKA中使用CAN或RA是否能改善疼痛结局。这是一项对327例初次TKA的多中心随机对照试验的回顾性研究。收集了人口统计学数据、手术时间、IT使用情况(CAN/RA)、住院时间(LOS)和阿片类药物消耗量(以吗啡毫克当量计)。通过将IT组(n = 110)与传统TKA队列(n = 217)进行比较来进行分析。在考虑人口统计学差异和止血带使用情况后,IT组的手术时间更短(88.77 ± 18.57分钟 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53分钟;P = 0.005)。虽然术后第1天的疼痛评分相似(P = 0.316),但IT组在术后2周(P = 0.006)和1个月(P = 0.005)时的阿片类药物消耗量较少,但在3个月时没有差异(P = 0.058)。在比较不同类型的IT、CAN和RA时,我们发现它们的手术时间相似(P = 0.610)且疼痛评分相似(P = 0.813)。两组在术后2周(P = 0.

相似文献

1
The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain.在全膝关节置换术中使用导航或机器人辅助技术并不能减轻术后疼痛。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Mar;36(4):439-444. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735313. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to similar 24-month WOMAC scores as compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.无影像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术相比,24 个月时 WOMAC 评分相似:一项回顾性队列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2631-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06599-4. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Differences in Pain, Opioid Use, and Function Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术后疼痛、阿片类药物使用和功能的差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2435-2438. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.072. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Robotic Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与手动全膝关节置换术:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(1):105-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731323. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.全膝关节置换术中使用术中技术与术后疼痛减轻无关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1370-1381. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07098-w. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
Does the Use of a Tourniquet Influence Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用止血带是否会影响全膝关节置换术的结果:一项随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2492-2496. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.068. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Utilizing NAVIO, CORI Imageless Systems and Manual TKA Accurately Restore Femoral Rotational Alignment and Yield Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.利用 NAVIO、CORI 无影像系统和手动 TKA 的机器人辅助全膝关节置换术可精确恢复股骨旋转对线并获得满意的临床结果:一项随机对照试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 27;59(2):236. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020236.
8
Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Allows for Trainee Involvement and Teaching Without Lengthening Operative Time.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术允许实习生参与并进行教学,且不延长手术时间。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6S):S201-S206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.030. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
9
Opioid Use in Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison to Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术中阿片类药物的使用:与传统手动全膝关节置换术的比较
Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov 28;37:280-289.
10
Transitioning a Practice to Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Correlated with Favorable Short-Term Clinical Outcomes-A Single Surgeon Experience.将膝关节置换手术实践转变为机器人全膝关节置换术与良好的短期临床结果相关——单外科医生经验
J Knee Surg. 2022 Jan;35(1):78-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712984. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview.全膝关节置换术机器人辅助技术的当前发展:全面概述
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05490-z.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis with varying severity deformity.不同严重程度畸形的膝关节骨关节炎患者机器人辅助全膝关节置换术疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 24;19(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05372-w.
3
Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeon Marketing: Do Claims Align With the Literature?
机器人全膝关节置换手术医生营销:宣传内容与文献相符吗?
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Mar 17;27:101357. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101357. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of economic and healthcare resource utilization outcomes for robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty.机器人全膝关节置换术与手动全膝关节置换术的经济学和医疗资源利用结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2899-2910. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01703-x. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Function in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Amongst Patients at King Fahad Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得法赫德国王医疗城患者中机器人全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术的术后疼痛与功能比较
Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36285. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Robotic systems in total knee arthroplasty: current surgical trauma perspectives.全膝关节置换术中的机器人系统:当前手术创伤视角
Burns Trauma. 2022 Dec 16;10:tkac049. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkac049. eCollection 2022.
7
Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.全膝关节置换术中使用术中技术与术后疼痛减轻无关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1370-1381. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07098-w. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
8
Comparison of serum inflammatory indicators and radiographic results in MAKO robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of Chinese patients.比较 MAKO 机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术治疗膝骨关节炎的血清炎症指标和影像学结果:一项中国患者的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 4;23(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05373-y.