Meyer Gabriele, Köpke Sascha
Medizinische Fakultät, Institut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Medizinische Fakultät & Uniklinik Köln, Institut für Pflegewissenschaft, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):562-568. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03690-8. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
The German Prevention Act obliges the nursing care insurance funds to provide health-promoting interventions and preventive offers in nursing homes. These interventions should clearly differ from activating nursing care and be of proven effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.The present opinion article critically appraises the evidence base of the interventions belonging to the pre-defined preventive areas "nutrition," "physical activity," "cognitive resources," "psychosocial health," and "prevention of elder abuse." The interventions' underlying evidence is weak or even missing. It is unclear whether the interventions contribute to the intended strengthening of the health-promoting potential of care facilities and meet the goal of improving the health situation and resources of the care-dependent people. On the other hand, there are areas of prevention, which are not covered, but have great potential for improving the life situation of those in need of care, for example, in the context of person-centered care and a caring nursing culture.
德国《预防法》规定,护理保险基金有义务在养老院提供促进健康的干预措施和预防性服务。这些干预措施应明显有别于积极的护理服务,且已证明具有有效性和成本效益。本观点文章批判性地评估了属于预先定义的预防领域“营养”“身体活动”“认知资源”“心理社会健康”和“预防虐待老年人”的干预措施的证据基础。这些干预措施的潜在证据薄弱甚至缺失。尚不清楚这些干预措施是否有助于按预期增强护理机构促进健康的潜力,以及是否符合改善依赖护理者的健康状况和资源这一目标。另一方面,存在一些未涵盖的预防领域,但在以个人为中心的护理和关爱护理文化背景下,这些领域在改善护理对象生活状况方面具有巨大潜力。