Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e950-e958. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.047. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
To evaluate the long-term feasibility of multiple overlapping stents (≥2) with or without coiling for treating blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs).
BBAs treated with stent-assisted coiling or stent-only therapy wasincluded. BBAs with atypical anatomical locations, other endovascular or surgical techniques performed, and delayed treatment (>48 hours) were excluded. Medical records of patients and procedures were retrospectively reviewed.
Seventeen patients with BBAs were identified, and 15 were treated with stent-assisted coiling and 2 with stent-only therapy. Triple overlapping stents were performed in seven patients, double stents in nine, and a single stent with coiling in 1. One patient experienced in-stent fibrin formation and received intra-arterial tirofiban. Complementary treatment was required in four patients. Three patients were initially treated with double (3/9) and 1 with triple stents (1/7). Three recurred in the acute period (≤6 weeks) and 1 recurred 14 months after treatment. Three of 17 patients with Hunt Hess grade 5 died early. Thirteen patients were available for long-term angiographic follow-up (13.8 ± 8.9 months). Final angiography showed complete aneurysm occlusion in all patients without in-stent stenosis or perforating vessel occlusion. Clinical follow-up data were available for all 14 surviving patients (66.8 ± 40.9 months). Eight patients had favorable outcomes, five had unfavorable outcomes, and 1 died of a subarachnoid hemorrhage-unrelated cause. Delayed infarct or hemorrhage was not documented.
Even in the era of flow diverter stents, the use of multiple overlapping stents with or without coiling can be a feasible alternative for treating ruptured BBAs.
评估治疗血泡样动脉瘤(BBAs)时使用或不使用线圈的多重重叠支架(≥2 个)的长期可行性。
纳入接受支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞或单纯支架治疗的 BBA 患者。排除具有非典型解剖位置、使用其他血管内或手术技术、以及延迟治疗(>48 小时)的患者。回顾性分析患者病历和手术过程。
共确定 17 例 BBA 患者,15 例行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗,2 例行单纯支架治疗。7 例患者行三重重叠支架,9 例患者行双重支架,1 例患者行单支架加线圈。1 例患者发生支架内纤维蛋白形成,接受了动脉内替罗非班治疗。4 例患者需要补充治疗。3 例患者最初接受双支架(3/9),1 例患者接受三重支架(1/7)。3 例患者在急性期(≤6 周)复发,1 例患者在治疗后 14 个月复发。3 例 Hunto Hess 分级为 5 级的患者早期死亡。17 例患者中有 13 例可进行长期血管造影随访(13.8±8.9 个月)。最终血管造影显示所有患者的动脉瘤完全闭塞,无支架内狭窄或穿支血管闭塞。14 例存活患者的临床随访资料均完整(66.8±40.9 个月)。8 例患者预后良好,5 例预后不良,1 例死于蛛网膜下腔出血无关的原因。未记录到迟发性梗死或出血。
即使在血流导向支架时代,使用或不使用线圈的多重重叠支架也可以作为治疗破裂性 BBA 的一种可行选择。