Multicenter study on visual color difference thresholds. A secondary analysis of light, medium, and dark tooth-colored specimens.

PURPOSE

This secondary analysis further analyzed variations in the 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds (PT and AT, respectively) pertaining to light, medium, and dark tooth-colored specimen sets.

METHODS

Primary raw data from the original study was retrieved. Visual thresholds (Perceptibility - PT and Acceptability - AT) were analyzed among the three specimen sets - light, medium, and dark. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for paired specimens, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric test was used for independent specimens (α= 0.001).

RESULTS

The 50:50% CIEDE2000 PT and AT values were significantly higher for the light-colored specimen set when compared with the medium and dark-colored specimens: 1.2, 0.7, 0.6, respectively (PT) and 2.2, 16, 14 (AT), respectively (P< 0.001). Independent of the observer group, the highest PT and AT values were always found for the light-colored specimen sets (P< 0.001). Dental laboratory technicians had the lowest visual thresholds, but not significantly different from the other observer groups studied (P> 0.001). Similarly, all research sites had statistically higher visual thresholds for the light-colored specimen set than for the medium- or dark-colored sets, except for two sites that showed statistically similar results for medium-colored specimens but were significantly different from the dark-colored set. Among the different research sites, sites 2 and 5 registered significantly higher PT thresholds for the light specimens (1.5 and 1.6, respectively), and site number 1 had a significantly higher AT threshold relative to the other sites. The 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were significantly different among light-, medium-, and dark-colored specimens for different research sites and observer groups.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The visual perception of color difference related to light-, medium-, and dark-colored specimens varied based on observer group and their geographic location. Therefore, a greater understanding of factors that affect visual thresholds, with the observers being "the most forgiving" for color differences among the light shades, will allow diverse clinicians to overcome some of the challenges of clinical color matching.