Broome Emma E, Tannirandorn Puntrika, Straus Jean, Beale Phoebe, Heffernan Eithne, Dening Tom, Henshaw Helen
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1143128. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1143128. eCollection 2023.
Both hearing loss and dementia are extremely pervasive, especially amongst older adults. As hearing loss and dementia have common symptoms, misdiagnosis can be common, and failure to address hearing loss for people with dementia could accelerate cognitive decline. The timely detection of cognitive impairment is clinically important, however the use of cognitive assessments in adult audiology services is a hotly debated topic. Although the early detection of cognitive impairment may improve patient care and quality of life, patients attending audiology services for hearing assessment might not expect to be asked questions about their cognition. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore patient and public perspectives and preferences on the use of cognitive screening within adult audiology services.
Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from an online survey and a workshop. Descriptive statistics were applied to quantitative data and an inductive thematic analysis was performed on free-text responses.
In total, 90 respondents completed the online survey. Overall, cognitive screening in audiology was reported to be acceptable to participants (92%). A reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative data reported four themes: i) knowledge of cognitive impairment and screening, ii) implementation of cognitive screening, iii) impact of screening on patient and iv) contributions to future care and research. A workshop was held with five participants to discuss and reflect on the findings in more detail.
Participants found cognitive screening to be acceptable within adult audiology services providing audiologists had suitable training, and sufficient explanation and justification were provided. However, implications such as additional time and staff resource and supplementary training for audiologists would be required to address participants concerns.
听力损失和痴呆症极为普遍,尤其是在老年人中。由于听力损失和痴呆症有共同症状,误诊可能很常见,而未能解决痴呆症患者的听力损失问题可能会加速认知衰退。认知障碍的及时检测在临床上很重要,然而在成人听力服务中使用认知评估是一个备受争议的话题。尽管早期发现认知障碍可能会改善患者护理和生活质量,但前往听力服务机构进行听力评估的患者可能并不期望被问及有关他们认知的问题。本研究的目的是定性探索患者和公众对在成人听力服务中使用认知筛查的看法和偏好。
通过在线调查和研讨会收集定量和定性数据。对定量数据应用描述性统计,并对自由文本回复进行归纳主题分析。
共有90名受访者完成了在线调查。总体而言,据报告参与者对听力服务中的认知筛查表示接受(92%)。对定性数据的反思性主题分析报告了四个主题:i)认知障碍和筛查的知识,ii)认知筛查的实施,iii)筛查对患者的影响,以及iv)对未来护理和研究的贡献。与五名参与者举行了一次研讨会,以更详细地讨论和思考研究结果。
参与者发现,在成人听力服务中,如果听力学家接受了适当的培训,并提供了充分的解释和理由,认知筛查是可以接受的。然而,为解决参与者的担忧,需要考虑额外的时间和工作人员资源以及为听力学家提供补充培训等问题。