• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性侵犯标签、对他人的同情、自我同情和指责受害者。

Sexual Assault Labels, Compassion for Others, Self-Compassion, and Victim Blaming.

机构信息

California State University, Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2024 Sep;30(11):2981-3004. doi: 10.1177/10778012231168635. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1177/10778012231168635
PMID:37078142
Abstract

Two studies examined whether label preferences (survivor, victim, neither/other/both) and past assault experience (assaulted or not assaulted) are related to compassion for others, self-compassion, rape myth acceptance, and cognitive distortions surrounding rape. Findings indicate that a preference for a victim label is related to more negative outcomes (e.g., propensity to victim-blame, less compassion for others) compared to those advocating for a survivor label or falling into a neither/other/both category. Furthermore, those who experienced sexual assault have significantly lower self-compassion compared to those who do not experience sexual assault. Implications for the impact of labels are discussed.

摘要

两项研究考察了标签偏好(幸存者、受害者、非幸存者/其他/两者都有)和过去的攻击经历(是否被攻击)是否与对他人的同情、自我同情、强奸神话接受度以及围绕强奸的认知扭曲有关。研究结果表明,与主张幸存者标签或属于非幸存者/其他/两者都有类别的人相比,更喜欢受害者标签与更负面的结果(例如,倾向于指责受害者,对他人的同情心减少)有关。此外,与没有经历过性侵犯的人相比,经历过性侵犯的人自我同情明显较低。讨论了标签的影响。

相似文献

1
Sexual Assault Labels, Compassion for Others, Self-Compassion, and Victim Blaming.性侵犯标签、对他人的同情、自我同情和指责受害者。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Sep;30(11):2981-3004. doi: 10.1177/10778012231168635. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Reconsidering Forced Labels: Outcomes of Sexual Assault Survivors Versus Victims (and Those Who Choose Neither).重新审视强制标签:性侵犯幸存者与受害者(以及那些两者都不选的人)的结果。
Violence Against Women. 2018 May;24(6):668-683. doi: 10.1177/1077801217711268. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
3
Are Survivors of Sexual Assault Blamed More Than Victims of Other Crimes?性侵犯幸存者比其他犯罪的受害者受到更多指责吗?
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP18394-NP18416. doi: 10.1177/08862605211037423. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
4
College Students' Responses to Their Sexually Assaulted Friends: Impact of Rape Myth Acceptance, Prior Victimization, and Social Relationships.大学生对遭受性侵犯朋友的反应:强奸谬论接受度、先前受害经历和社会关系的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jan;50(1):263-275. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01842-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Sexual Assault Among College Women: The Role of Survivor Acknowledgment, Rape Myth Acceptance, Weight Bias, and Body Appreciation.女大学生中的性侵犯:幸存者承认、强奸谬论接受、体重偏见和身体欣赏的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jun;39(11-12):2687-2707. doi: 10.1177/08862605231223993. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
6
The Influence of Sexual Orientation on Attributions of Blame Toward Victims of Sexual Assault.性取向对性侵犯受害者归因于谴责的影响。
J Homosex. 2020;67(2):189-205. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1534412. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Responding to Disclosure of Sexual Assault: The Potential Impact of Victimization History and Rape Myth Acceptance.回应性侵犯披露:受害者史和强奸神话接受的潜在影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):2102-2125. doi: 10.1177/0886260519898429. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
8
Sexual Assault Disclosure: The Effect of Victim Race and Perpetrator Type on Empathy, Culpability, and Service Referral for Survivors in a Hypothetical Scenario.性侵犯披露:在假设情境中,受害者种族和施害者类型对幸存者的同理心、罪责感和服务转介的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2327-2352. doi: 10.1177/0886260518759656. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
9
"It is Hard to Think About": A Mixed-Method Exploration into the Application of the Theory of Compassion Collapse to the #MeToo Movement.“难以思考”:对“我也是”运动中应用同情崩溃理论的混合方法探索。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):8898-8920. doi: 10.1177/08862605231160823. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
Rape Myth Acceptance and Other Barriers to Formally Reporting Sexual Assault Among College Students With and Without Sexual Assault Histories.有无性侵犯史的大学生对强奸谬见的认同及正式报告性侵犯的其他障碍
J Interpers Violence. 2023 May;38(9-10):6773-6797. doi: 10.1177/08862605221137703. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking sexual violence labels: exploring the impact of 'victim' and 'survivor' discourse.重新思考性暴力标签:探索“受害者”和“幸存者”话语的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2296329. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2296329. Epub 2024 Jan 5.