• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自闭症谱系障碍筛查——《社会沟通问卷》葡萄牙语版本的验证

Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders - Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.

作者信息

Araújo Manuela, Jorge Joana Calejo, do Carmo Santos Maria, Vilhena Estela, Oliveira Pedro, Freitas Paula Pinto

机构信息

Departamento de Psiquiatria da Infância e Adolescência - Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

2Ai - School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Feb;56(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01535-8. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10578-023-01535-8
PMID:37079183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11828831/
Abstract

There are no assessment and screening tools for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) validated for the Portuguese population. The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) is an useful screening tool of ASD diagnosis. The main objectives of our study were to produce a Portuguese version of the SCQ (SCQ-PF), study its internal consistency, sensitivity and specificity in order to evaluate its validity as a screening instrument for ASD. We also wanted to study the impact of intellectual disability and verbal impairment and other mental disorders on SCQ-PF psychometric properties. The study included 211 children and adolescents, aged 4-17, divided in three groups: ASD Group (n = 96), Other Mental Disorders Group (OMD) (n = 63) and No Mental Disorders (NMD) Group (n = 52). Parents or other primary caregiver provided information on the SCQ items. The SCQ-PF score was significantly higher in the ASD group than in the other groups (p < 0.001). As to internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was 87%. ASD subjects were distinguished from subjects without ASD (OMD and NMD Groups) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.897 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.852-0.943), for a cutoff of 14, which yielded the highest AUC, with values of sensitivity and specificity 0.76 and 0.93, respectively. These findings show that SCQ- PF with a cutoff of 14 is an acceptable and useful screening tool for ASD in the Portuguese population.

摘要

目前尚无针对葡萄牙人群验证有效的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)评估和筛查工具。社会交往问卷(SCQ)是一种用于ASD诊断的有用筛查工具。我们研究的主要目的是制作SCQ的葡萄牙语版本(SCQ-PF),研究其内部一致性、敏感性和特异性,以评估其作为ASD筛查工具的有效性。我们还想研究智力残疾、语言障碍和其他精神障碍对SCQ-PF心理测量特性的影响。该研究纳入了211名4至17岁的儿童和青少年,分为三组:ASD组(n = 96)、其他精神障碍组(OMD)(n = 63)和无精神障碍组(NMD)(n = 52)。父母或其他主要照顾者提供了有关SCQ项目的信息。ASD组的SCQ-PF得分显著高于其他组(p < 0.001)。至于内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha为87%。ASD受试者与无ASD的受试者(OMD组和NMD组)有区别,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.897(95%置信区间:0.852 - 0.943),截断值为14时产生的AUC最高,敏感性和特异性值分别为0.76和0.93。这些结果表明,截断值为14的SCQ-PF是葡萄牙人群中一种可接受且有用的ASD筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders - Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.自闭症谱系障碍筛查——《社会沟通问卷》葡萄牙语版本的验证
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Feb;56(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01535-8. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
The psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.《社会沟通问卷》希腊语版的心理测量学特性。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1768-1780. doi: 10.1002/aur.2790. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
3
The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.《社会交往问卷简化中文版的有效性和可靠性》。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1732-1741. doi: 10.1002/aur.2726. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Differentiating Autism Spectrum Disorder From ADHD Using the Social Communication Questionnaire.使用社会沟通问卷区分自闭症谱系障碍与注意缺陷多动障碍。
J Atten Disord. 2019 Jun;23(8):828-837. doi: 10.1177/1087054718781945. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Validation of the social communication questionnaire amongst Nigerian adolescents.验证社会沟通问卷在尼日利亚青少年中的适用性。
Autism Res. 2024 Jan;17(1):66-77. doi: 10.1002/aur.3038. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Validity of the social communication questionnaire in adults with intellectual disabilities and suspected autism spectrum disorder.社交沟通问卷在智障及疑似自闭症谱系障碍成人中的效度
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 May;120(3):203-14. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-120.3.203.
7
An initial evaluation of the Social Communication Questionnaire for the assessment of autism spectrum disorders in children with Down syndrome.用于评估唐氏综合征儿童自闭症谱系障碍的社会沟通问卷的初步评估。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Feb;33(2):134-45. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318240d3d9.
8
Brief Report: An Evaluation of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young People Referred to Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services.简要报告:社会沟通问卷作为儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构转介人群自闭症谱系障碍筛查工具的评估。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jun;49(6):2618-2623. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03982-6.
9
Influence of family demographic factors on social communication questionnaire scores.家庭人口统计学因素对社会沟通问卷评分的影响。
Autism Res. 2018 May;11(5):695-706. doi: 10.1002/aur.1935. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
The reliability and validity of the social responsiveness scale to measure autism symptomology in Vietnamese children.社会反应性量表在越南儿童自闭症症状评估中的信度和效度。
Autism Res. 2019 Nov;12(11):1706-1718. doi: 10.1002/aur.2179. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.《社会沟通问卷》希腊语版的心理测量学特性。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1768-1780. doi: 10.1002/aur.2790. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.《社会交往问卷简化中文版的有效性和可靠性》。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1732-1741. doi: 10.1002/aur.2726. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Co-morbidities in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review.
儿童和青少年自闭症谱系障碍及共病的患病率:一项系统文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 27;12:744709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.744709. eCollection 2021.
4
Early Autism Screening: A Comprehensive Review.早期自闭症筛查:全面综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 19;16(18):3502. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183502.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of early screening for autism.自闭症早期筛查的敏感性和特异性。
BJPsych Open. 2019 May 17;5(3):e41. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.34.
6
Validation of the Arabic version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.验证《社会沟通问卷》的阿拉伯语版本。
Autism. 2019 Oct;23(7):1655-1662. doi: 10.1177/1362361318816065. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Editorial: The rising prevalence of autism.社论:自闭症的发病率不断上升。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;59(7):717-720. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12941.
8
Sensitivity and Specificity of 2 Autism Screeners Among Referred Children Between 16 and 48 Months of Age.16 至 48 月龄转诊儿童中两种自闭症筛查工具的灵敏度和特异度。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Apr;39(3):254-258. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000537.
9
Analysis of Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) Screening for Children Less Than Age 4.针对4岁以下儿童的社会沟通问卷(SCQ)筛查分析。
Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2017;4(4):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s40474-017-0122-1. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
10
A meta-analysis of the social communication questionnaire: Screening for autism spectrum disorder.社会沟通问卷的荟萃分析:自闭症谱系障碍筛查。
Autism. 2017 Nov;21(8):920-928. doi: 10.1177/1362361316660065. Epub 2016 Aug 7.