• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证社会沟通问卷在尼日利亚青少年中的适用性。

Validation of the social communication questionnaire amongst Nigerian adolescents.

机构信息

Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), and Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, University of Warwick and Brooklands Hospital, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2024 Jan;17(1):66-77. doi: 10.1002/aur.3038. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1002/aur.3038
PMID:37795675
Abstract

Few autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening tools have been developed and validated in Africa. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) when used with Nigerian adolescents. Parents and caregivers of two hundred and five adolescents completed the SCQ Lifetime form while the adolescents were assessed for ASD using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition (ADOS-2). Factor structure and convergent and discriminative validity were examined, along with the sensitivity and specificity of the SCQ in identifying participants with an autism spectrum disorder. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure, while logistic regression and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to examine the validities. The SCQ had good internal consistency, discriminative, and convergent validity. A cut-off score of 10 revealed sensitivity = 0.81 and specificity = 0.88 for the identification of autism spectrum disorder. AUC was 0.83, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.77, 0.90]. The results of this study provide evidence to support the retention of the original four factors of the SCQ. The SCQ has good psychometric properties when used with Nigerian adolescents.

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 的筛查工具在非洲开发和验证的很少。本研究旨在考察社会交往问卷 (SCQ) 在尼日利亚青少年中的心理测量特性。205 名青少年的父母和照顾者完成了 SCQ 终身形式,而青少年则使用自闭症诊断观察量表,第二版 (ADOS-2) 进行 ASD 评估。同时考察了因子结构和收敛和判别效度,以及 SCQ 在识别自闭症谱系障碍参与者方面的敏感性和特异性。验证性因子分析 (CFA) 用于检验因子结构,而逻辑回归和 Pearson 相关系数用于检验效度。SCQ 具有良好的内部一致性、判别和收敛效度。截断值为 10 时,对自闭症谱系障碍的识别灵敏度为 0.81,特异性为 0.88。AUC 为 0.83,p < 0.001,95%CI [0.77, 0.90]。本研究结果为保留 SCQ 的原始四个因素提供了证据。SCQ 在尼日利亚青少年中具有良好的心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Validation of the social communication questionnaire amongst Nigerian adolescents.验证社会沟通问卷在尼日利亚青少年中的适用性。
Autism Res. 2024 Jan;17(1):66-77. doi: 10.1002/aur.3038. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
The psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.《社会沟通问卷》希腊语版的心理测量学特性。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1768-1780. doi: 10.1002/aur.2790. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
3
The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.《社会交往问卷简化中文版的有效性和可靠性》。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1732-1741. doi: 10.1002/aur.2726. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Concurrent and Discriminant Validity of the Farsi Translation of the Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2) and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ).社会反应量表第二版(SRS - 2)和社会沟通问卷(SCQ)波斯语翻译版本的同时效度和区分效度
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;19(2):221-228. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i2.15108.
5
Between a ROC and a hard place: decision making and making decisions about using the SCQ.进退两难:关于使用社会沟通问卷(SCQ)的决策制定与做出决策
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;48(9):932-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01762.x.
6
Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders - Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Social Communication Questionnaire.自闭症谱系障碍筛查——《社会沟通问卷》葡萄牙语版本的验证
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Feb;56(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01535-8. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
7
Influence of family demographic factors on social communication questionnaire scores.家庭人口统计学因素对社会沟通问卷评分的影响。
Autism Res. 2018 May;11(5):695-706. doi: 10.1002/aur.1935. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Why are only some children with autism spectrum disorder misclassified by the social communication questionnaire? An empirical investigation of individual differences in sensitivity and specificity in a clinic-referred sample.为什么只有部分自闭症谱系障碍儿童会被社交沟通问卷误诊?对临床就诊样本中敏感性和特异性个体差异的实证研究。
J Neurodev Disord. 2023 Aug 22;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s11689-023-09497-7.
9
Differentiating Autism Spectrum Disorder From ADHD Using the Social Communication Questionnaire.使用社会沟通问卷区分自闭症谱系障碍与注意缺陷多动障碍。
J Atten Disord. 2019 Jun;23(8):828-837. doi: 10.1177/1087054718781945. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
Specificity and sensitivity of the social communication questionnaire lifetime screening tool for autism spectrum disorder in a UK CAMHS service.英国儿童和青少年心理健康服务中心使用社会沟通问卷终身筛查工具评估自闭症谱系障碍的特异性和敏感性。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;28(3):952-964. doi: 10.1177/13591045221137196. Epub 2022 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Social Communication Questionnaire in Rural Kenya.肯尼亚农村地区社交沟通问卷心理测量特性评估
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06380-9.