• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有效利用 RWD 进行外部控制:监管和 HTA 决策的系统文献回顾。

Effectively Leveraging RWD for External Controls: A Systematic Literature Review of Regulatory and HTA Decisions.

机构信息

Fundació Health Innovation Technology Transfer and International, University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Aug;114(2):325-355. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2914. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.2914
PMID:37079433
Abstract

Real-world data (RWD)-derived external controls can be used to contextualize efficacy findings for investigational therapies evaluated in uncontrolled trials. As the number of submissions to regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) bodies using external controls rises, and in light of recent regulatory and HTA guidance on the appropriate use of RWD, there is a need to address the operational and methodological challenges impeding the quality of real-world evidence (RWE) generation and the consistency in evaluation of RWE across agencies. This systematic review summarizes publicly available information on the use of external controls to contextualize outcomes from uncontrolled trials for all indications from January 1, 2015, through August 20, 2021, that were submitted to the European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, and/or select major HTA bodies (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), and Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA)). By systematically reviewing submissions to regulatory and HTA bodies in the context of recent guidance, this study provides quantitative and qualitative insights into how external control design and analytic choices may be viewed by different agencies in practice. The primary operational and methodological aspects identified for discussion include, but are not limited to, engagement of regulators and HTA bodies, approaches to handling missing data (a component of data quality), and selection of real-world endpoints. Continued collaboration and guidance to address these and other aspects will inform and assist stakeholders attempting to generate evidence using external controls.

摘要

真实世界数据(RWD)衍生的外部对照可用于将在对照试验中评估的研究性治疗的疗效发现置于背景中。随着越来越多的使用外部对照的监管和卫生技术评估(HTA)机构提交的数量增加,以及最近关于 RWD 适当使用的监管和 HTA 指南,有必要解决阻碍真实世界证据(RWE)生成质量和各机构对 RWE 评估一致性的操作和方法学挑战。本系统评价总结了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 20 日期间,为向欧洲药品管理局、美国食品和药物管理局以及/或选定的主要 HTA 机构(国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NICE)、法国公共卫生高级管理局(HAS)、德国联邦健康教育中心(IQWiG)和德国联邦联合委员会(G-BA))提交的用于为所有适应症的对照试验结果提供背景信息的外部对照使用的公开可用信息。通过在最近的指南背景下系统地审查监管和 HTA 机构的提交情况,本研究提供了定量和定性的见解,了解不同机构在实践中如何看待外部对照设计和分析选择。确定用于讨论的主要操作和方法学方面包括但不限于监管机构和 HTA 机构的参与、处理缺失数据(数据质量的一个组成部分)的方法以及真实世界终点的选择。继续合作和提供指导以解决这些和其他方面的问题,将为试图使用外部对照生成证据的利益相关者提供信息和帮助。

相似文献

1
Effectively Leveraging RWD for External Controls: A Systematic Literature Review of Regulatory and HTA Decisions.有效利用 RWD 进行外部控制:监管和 HTA 决策的系统文献回顾。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Aug;114(2):325-355. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2914. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
2
A Review of the Use of EQ-5D for Clinical Outcome Assessment in Health Technology Assessment, Regulatory Claims, and Published Literature.EQ-5D在卫生技术评估、监管声明及已发表文献中用于临床结局评估的综述
Patient. 2024 May;17(3):239-249. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00662-7. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme.衡量卫生研究影响的模型与应用:卫生技术评估项目系统评价的更新
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(76):1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta20760.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn's disease.TNF-α 抑制剂(阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)治疗克罗恩病的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(6):1-244. doi: 10.3310/hta15060.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
ImmunoCAP® ISAC and Microtest for multiplex allergen testing in people with difficult to manage allergic disease: a systematic review and cost analysis.ImmunoCAP® ISAC和微量试验用于难治性过敏性疾病患者的多重过敏原检测:系统评价与成本分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Sep;20(67):1-178. doi: 10.3310/hta20670.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic factors and effect modifiers in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who failed at least two lines of therapy: a systematic literature and expert clinical review.至少接受过两线治疗失败的复发或难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的预后因素和效应修饰因素:一项系统文献和专家临床综述
Ann Hematol. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06575-9.
2
Evaluating the Role and Policy Implications of Using External Evidence in Survival Extrapolations: A Case Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Therapy for Second-Line DLBCL.评估外部证据在生存外推中的作用及政策影响:以阿基仑赛治疗二线弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤为例
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01529-5.
3
Challenges in estimating the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence rate from a registration cohort: The PrEPVacc trial.
从登记队列估计反事实安慰剂HIV发病率的挑战:PrEPVacc试验。
Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;22(3):289-300. doi: 10.1177/17407745241304721. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
4
PMDA Perspective on Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence as an External Control: Recent Examples and Considerations.日本药品和医疗器械管理局关于将真实世界数据和真实世界证据用作外部对照的观点:近期实例与考量
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):910-919. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3540. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
5
A Framework for the Use and Likelihood of Regulatory Acceptance of Single-Arm Trials.用于监管机构接受单臂试验的可能性和使用的框架。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Nov;58(6):1214-1232. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00693-8. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
The impact of different censoring methods for analyzing survival using real-world data with linked mortality information: a simulation study.利用具有链接死亡率信息的真实世界数据分析生存情况时,不同删失方法的影响:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02313-3.
7
Generalizability in real-world trials.真实世界试验中的可推广性。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13886. doi: 10.1111/cts.13886.
8
EU HTA Joint Clinical Assessment: are patients with rare disease going to lose out?欧盟卫生技术评估联合临床评估:罕见病患者会因此处于劣势吗?
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Jun;13(6):e240052. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0052. Epub 2024 May 2.