Suppr超能文献

评估澳大利亚部分保护海洋保护区的多重效益:系统评价方案。

Assessing the multiple benefits of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: A systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, The University of Tasmania, Taroona, Tasmania, Australia.

Centre for Marine Socioecology, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284711. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is global pressure to protect more of the world's oceans, primarily to protect biodiversity, and to fulfill the "30 by 30" goal set by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that has recently been ratified under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework at the fifteenth Conference of Parties (COP-15). Fully protected marine protected areas (MPAs) provide the highest level of protection for biodiversity from destructive or extractive practices and may limit access to the area itself. Fully protected MPAs (also commonly referred to as 'no-take MPAs') ban all fishing activities, thereby removing the realisation of direct economic and social benefits from resource extraction within these areas. However, fully protected MPAs can still act as source of productivity to surrounding areas, while also providing an important scientific reference role for off-reserve management thereby providing indirect economic and social outcomes, as well as biodiversity benefits. Sustainable marine resource management strives to achieve 'triple-bottom line' benefits, where economic, social, and biodiversity benefits are maximised in managed areas of the ocean. Implementing 'partially protected' areas (PPAs) in areas of high biodiversity value (i.e., inshore, productive areas of the ocean) that allow for some extractive activities, may allow us to supplement fully MPAs to meet IUCN conservation goals, while maximising social and economic benefits. However, our current understanding lacks explicit quantitative assessments of whether and how PPAs can benefit (or otherwise) biodiversity, while also providing economic and social benefits. This study provides a method to systematically review the scientific and legislative literature to understand how PPAs may contribute to conserving biodiversity while also providing social and economic benefits to Australia.

METHODS AND EXPECTED OUTPUTS

The implementation of partially protected areas (PPAs) requires careful consideration of many potentially competing factors, and an understanding of the types of partial protection already in place in a region. We have developed a systematic literature review protocol focussing on the primary research question: "What is the current state of partially protected area (PPA) implementation across Australian marine areas?". The aim of the review is to provide marine resource managers with a comprehensive overview of PPAs in Australia, including associated goals and stated management strategies to achieve these goals, and a methodological approach that may be utilised globally. The review protocol was designed by the research team for a Fisheries Resource and Development Corporation (FRDC) strategic research grant and will seek input from a project steering committee for the project on aggregation of the initial results. The steering committee is made up of stakeholders from a wide range of backgrounds and interests, covering marine conservation, fisheries management, Indigenous values, and academic research in Australia. Multiple academic databases, alongside Australian Federal, State, and Territory legislation and related policies will be reviewed using Boolean keyword search strings for both academic databases and relevant grey literature. Results from eligible documents will be compiled and insights from the review collated to provide information on the status of PPA implementation in Australia.

摘要

背景

全球有保护更多海洋的压力,主要是为了保护生物多样性,并实现国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)最近在第十五届缔约方大会(COP-15)上通过的《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》下批准的“30 by 30”目标。完全保护区(MPA)为生物多样性提供了最高水平的保护,使其免受破坏性或提取性实践的影响,并可能限制进入该地区本身。完全保护区(通常也称为“无捕捞保护区”)禁止所有渔业活动,从而使这些地区无法从资源开采中获得直接的经济和社会效益。然而,完全保护区仍然可以作为周边地区的生产力来源,同时为非保护区管理提供重要的科学参考作用,从而带来间接的经济和社会效益以及生物多样性效益。可持续海洋资源管理努力实现“三重底线”效益,即在海洋管理区域内实现经济、社会和生物多样性效益最大化。在高生物多样性价值地区(即近海、海洋生产力区域)实施“部分保护区”(PPA),允许进行一些提取活动,可能使我们能够补充完全保护区,以实现 IUCN 保护目标,同时最大限度地提高社会和经济效益。然而,我们目前的理解缺乏明确的定量评估,即 PPA 是否以及如何能够有益于(或否则)生物多样性,同时提供经济和社会效益。本研究提供了一种系统地审查科学和立法文献的方法,以了解 PPA 如何有助于保护澳大利亚的生物多样性,同时为澳大利亚提供社会和经济效益。

方法和预期产出

部分保护区(PPA)的实施需要仔细考虑许多潜在的竞争因素,并了解该地区已经实施的部分保护类型。我们已经制定了一个系统的文献综述方案,重点关注主要研究问题:“澳大利亚海洋区域部分保护区(PPA)的实施现状如何?”。该审查的目的是为海洋资源管理者提供澳大利亚 PPA 的全面概述,包括相关目标和实现这些目标的既定管理策略,以及一种可能在全球范围内使用的方法。该审查方案是由研究团队为渔业资源和发展公司(FRDC)的战略研究资助而设计的,并将寻求该项目指导委员会对项目初始结果的汇总的意见。指导委员会由来自广泛背景和利益相关者组成,涵盖海洋保护、渔业管理、土著价值观以及澳大利亚的学术研究。将使用学术数据库以及澳大利亚联邦、州和地区立法和相关政策的布尔关键词搜索字符串对多个学术数据库进行审查。将对符合条件的文件的结果进行编译,并对审查结果进行汇总,以提供有关澳大利亚 PPA 实施情况的信息。

相似文献

1
Assessing the multiple benefits of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: A systematic review protocol.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284711. eCollection 2023.
2
The ambiguous role of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: Results from a systematic literature review.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0307324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307324. eCollection 2025.
3
Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):627-646. doi: 10.1111/brv.12246. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
4
Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.
Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):691-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00896.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
5
Drivers of ecological effectiveness of marine protected areas: A meta-analytic approach from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazil).
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113889. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113889. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Deficiencies in monitoring practices of marine protected areas in southern European seas.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;355:120476. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120476. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
7
Increased connectivity and depth improve the effectiveness of marine reserves.
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(15):3432-3447. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15635. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
Marine protected areas for dive tourism.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 11;15(1):1923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83664-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The ambiguous role of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: Results from a systematic literature review.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0307324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307324. eCollection 2025.
2
Drivers in the fisheries domain: A bibliometric and text mining analysis.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33335. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33335. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The MPA Guide: A framework to achieve global goals for the ocean.
Science. 2021 Sep 10;373(6560):eabf0861. doi: 10.1126/science.abf0861.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
3
Evaluating the social and ecological effectiveness of partially protected marine areas.
Conserv Biol. 2021 Jun;35(3):921-932. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13677. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;4(12):1582-1589. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01295-x. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis.
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Dec;10(4):606-614. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1374. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets.
Sci Adv. 2019 Apr 19;5(4):eaaw2869. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2869. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science.
PLoS Biol. 2016 Dec 29;14(12):e2000933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
Marine reserves: size and age do matter.
Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):481-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01166.x. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
9
Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management.
Conserv Biol. 2006 Dec;20(6):1647-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验