Suppr超能文献

使用《指南研究与评价II》工具对痔病管理现行指南的评估

Evaluation of the current guidelines for the management of haemorrhoidal disease using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II instrument.

作者信息

Gavriilidis Paschalis, Askari Alan, Gavriilidis Efstratios, Di Saverio Salomone, Davies R Justin, de'Angelis Nicola

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS, Coventry, UK.

Cambridge Oesophagogastric Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 31;11(6):265. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4255. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoids are a very common disease and many professional societies have produced guidelines for their treatment. The aim of this study is to appraise the quality of the existing guidelines in the management of haemorrhoids.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and PubMed databases. The quality of guidelines was independently appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument by five of the authors.

RESULTS

Six guidelines of varying quality were identified and included in this study. The highest scoring guidelines were the SICCR (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colorectale, which is Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery), ESCP (European Society of Coloproctology) and ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons) guidelines, scoring 86% each overall. There was considerable variability across not just the studies but across the different domains. The highest scoring domains were domain VI: editorial independence (median =95% across all studies) and domain I: Scope & Purpose (85%). The lowest scores were observed in domain V: Applicability (48%) and domain II: Stakeholder Involvement (41%). Only three of the six gained unanimous support for their use, whilst two of the guidelines were unanimously declared not suitable for clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS

With the notable exception of three guidelines (SICCR, ESCP and ASCRS), the general quality of haemorrhoid guidelines is poor. Stakeholder (especially patient) involvement and instructions on how to implement recommendations is lacking from the majority of guidelines. This is an area that requires urgent attention if we are to improve guidelines in haemorrhoid management.

摘要

背景

痔疮是一种非常常见的疾病,许多专业学会都制定了其治疗指南。本研究的目的是评估现有痔疮管理指南的质量。

方法

在EMBASE、谷歌学术、Cochrane图书馆和PubMed数据库中对文献进行系统检索。由五位作者使用《指南研究与评价II》(AGREE II)工具独立评估指南的质量。

结果

本研究确定并纳入了六项质量参差不齐的指南。得分最高的指南是意大利结直肠外科学会(SICCR)、欧洲结直肠外科学会(ESCP)和美国结直肠外科医师学会(ASCRS)的指南,总体得分均为86%。不仅各项研究之间存在很大差异,而且不同领域之间也存在差异。得分最高的领域是领域VI:编辑独立性(所有研究的中位数=95%)和领域I:范围与目的(85%)。得分最低的是领域V:适用性(48%)和领域II:利益相关者参与(41%)。六项指南中只有三项获得了对其使用的一致支持,而其中两项指南被一致宣布不适合临床使用。

结论

除了三项指南(SICCR、ESCP和ASCRS)外,痔疮指南的总体质量较差。大多数指南缺乏利益相关者(尤其是患者)的参与以及关于如何实施建议的说明。如果我们要改进痔疮管理指南,这是一个需要紧急关注的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa50/10113081/56a614dc0022/atm-11-06-265-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验