• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于创伤性脑损伤的参与和执行功能的新评估 (A-PEX):一项有效性研究。

A novel assessment of participation and executive functions (A-PEX) for traumatic brain injury: a validity study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel -

Department of Occupational Therapy, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Ra'anana, Israel -

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):317-326. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07868-1. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07868-1
PMID:37083100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272933/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Executive function deficits are a main cause of participation restrictions post-traumatic brain injury (TBI). Assessing executive functions through actual daily participation may provide valuable information for treatment planning and progress.

AIM

This study aimed to validate the Assessment of Participation and Executive Functions (A-PEX), a tool for evaluating executive function deficits through actual participation in the inpatient rehabilitation context during the subacute phase following TBI.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional with a longitudinal component.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation facility.

POPULATION

This study included 56 participants divided into two groups: 30 with orthopedic or spinal cord injuries and 26 with TBI.

METHODS

Internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients. Known-group construct validity was examined by comparing the A-PEX scores between the two groups, and A-PEX convergent construct validity for patients with TBI was examined using correlations between scores on the A-PEX, Multiple Errands Test-hospital version (MET-HV), and Color Trail Test (CTT).

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the A-PEX domains ranged between 0.83 and 0.96, indicating good-to-excellent internal consistency. Interclass correlations calculated for the control group indicated moderate test-retest reliability for most A-PEX components. Participants with TBI scored significantly lower than those with orthopedic or spinal cord injury for all A-PEX components (P<0.001). Within the TBI group, significant moderate-to-strong correlations were found between all A-PEX components and the MET-HV (0.52<r<0.73, P<0.05) and between the A-PEX executive function scales and the CTT (r=0.52, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide evidence for the initial reliability and validity of the A-PEX as a measure of post-TBI executive functions.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

By evaluating actual everyday participation, the A-PEX provides valuable clinical insight into the interrelationship between executive functions and participation in the post-TBI subacute phase.

摘要

背景

执行功能缺陷是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后参与受限的主要原因。通过实际日常参与评估执行功能可以为治疗计划和进展提供有价值的信息。

目的

本研究旨在验证评估参与和执行功能(A-PEX),这是一种在 TBI 亚急性期通过实际参与住院康复环境来评估执行功能缺陷的工具。

设计

具有纵向成分的横断面研究。

设置

住院康复设施。

人群

这项研究包括 56 名参与者,分为两组:30 名骨科或脊髓损伤患者和 26 名 TBI 患者。

方法

采用 Cronbach's alpha 评估内部一致性,采用组内相关系数评估重测信度。通过比较两组之间的 A-PEX 评分来检验 A-PEX 的已知组构效度,通过 A-PEX、多项差事测试-医院版(MET-HV)和色迹测试(CTT)之间的评分相关性来检验 A-PEX 在 TBI 患者中的收敛构效关系。

结果

A-PEX 各领域的 Cronbach's alpha 系数在 0.83 至 0.96 之间,表明具有良好至优秀的内部一致性。为对照组计算的组内相关系数表明,大多数 A-PEX 成分具有中等程度的重测信度。与骨科或脊髓损伤患者相比,TBI 患者在所有 A-PEX 成分上的得分明显较低(P<0.001)。在 TBI 组内,所有 A-PEX 成分与 MET-HV 之间存在显著的中度至强相关性(0.52<r<0.73,P<0.05),A-PEX 执行功能量表与 CTT 之间存在显著的中度相关性(r=0.52,P<0.05)。

结论

这些发现为 A-PEX 作为 TBI 后执行功能的测量工具的初步可靠性和有效性提供了证据。

临床康复影响

通过评估实际的日常参与,A-PEX 提供了有价值的临床洞察力,了解了执行功能与 TBI 亚急性期参与之间的相互关系。

相似文献

1
A novel assessment of participation and executive functions (A-PEX) for traumatic brain injury: a validity study.一种用于创伤性脑损伤的参与和执行功能的新评估 (A-PEX):一项有效性研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):317-326. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07868-1. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
2
Profiles of executive functioning following traumatic brain injury and stroke using the assessment of participation and executive functions: combined cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.创伤性脑损伤和中风后执行功能的特征:使用参与和执行功能评估:联合横断面和纵向设计。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 18;56:jrm12427. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.12427.
3
Efficacy of Intervention of Participation and Executive Functions (I-PEX) for Adults Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.参与和执行功能干预(I-PEX)对颅脑损伤后成年人的疗效:一项初步的随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Apr;38(4):279-290. doi: 10.1177/15459683241231529. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
Establishing the Validity of the Internet-Based Bill-Paying Task to Assess Executive Function Deficits Among Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.建立基于互联网的账单支付任务的有效性,以评估创伤性脑损伤成年人的执行功能缺陷。
Am J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul 1;76(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.047266.
5
Factor structure of the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool (BAST) in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤行为评估筛查工具(BAST)的因子结构。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jan;42(2):255-260. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1496487. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
6
Initial Evidence for Reliable and Valid Use of Scores on the 8-Item Econ-QOL Short Form to Measure Economic Quality of Life in Caregivers of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者照顾者经济生活质量的 8 项经济生活质量短表评分可靠有效使用的初步证据。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar;104(3):430-437. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
7
Reliability and validity of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury.罗澜通用失智评估量表用于颅脑损伤患者的信度和效度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Sep-Oct;29(5):1160-1166. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1856850. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Validation of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) and reference norms in a French-Canadian population with traumatic brain injury receiving rehabilitation.验证 Mayo-Portland 适应能力量表第四版(MPAI-4)及其参考常模在接受康复治疗的创伤性脑损伤的法裔加拿大人中的适用性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5250-5256. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1924882. Epub 2021 May 23.
9
Using the interviewer-administered version of Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) in Russia: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties in traumatic spinal cord injury.在俄罗斯使用由访谈者实施的工作康复问卷(WORQ):创伤性脊髓损伤中的跨文化适应及心理测量特性
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(21):6452-6461. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1966521. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
10
German version, inter- and intrarater reliability and internal consistency of the "Agitated Behavior Scale" (ABS-G) in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.德语版本,“激越行为量表”(ABS-G)在中重度创伤性脑损伤患者中的评分者间信度、评分者内信度及内部一致性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0511-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of executive functioning following traumatic brain injury and stroke using the assessment of participation and executive functions: combined cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.创伤性脑损伤和中风后执行功能的特征:使用参与和执行功能评估:联合横断面和纵向设计。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 18;56:jrm12427. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.12427.

本文引用的文献

1
The interrelationship of functional skills in individuals living in the community, following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后社区居民功能技能的相互关系。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(2):129-136. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1539762. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
3
Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: A systematic review.评估老年人患者报告结局测量工具的重测信度:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Neurobehavioral Abnormalities Associated with Executive Dysfunction after Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后与执行功能障碍相关的神经行为异常
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct 26;11:195. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00195. eCollection 2017.
5
Special issue on ecological validity and cognitive assessment.关于生态效度与认知评估的特刊
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Jul;27(5):599-602. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1313379.
6
How do assessments of activities of daily living address executive functions: A scoping review.日常生活活动评估如何涉及执行功能:一项范围综述。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Jul;27(5):618-666. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1268171. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
7
After critical care: Challenges in the transition to inpatient rehabilitation.重症监护之后:向住院康复过渡中的挑战。
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 May;61(2):186-200. doi: 10.1037/rep0000072.
8
A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the PariS-TBI study.严重脑损伤 4 年预后的全面描述。PariS-TBI 研究结果。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;59(2):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Reliability and construct validity of a revised Baycrest Multiple Errands Test.修订版贝克莱斯特多重任务测试的信度和结构效度。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Jul;27(5):667-684. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1117981. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Europe: A Living Systematic Review.欧洲创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:一项实时系统评价。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 15;38(10):1411-1440. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4126. Epub 2018 Dec 19.