Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 Apr 3;64(4):26. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.4.26.
Animal models suggest that ON retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) may be more vulnerable to diabetic insult than OFF cells. Using three psychophysical tasks to infer the function of ON and OFF RGCs, we hypothesized that functional responses to contrast increments will be preferentially affected in early diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to contrast decrement responses.
Fifty-two people with DM (type 1 or type 2) (mean age = 34.8 years, range = 18-60 years) and 48 age-matched controls (mean age = 35.4 years, range = 18-60 years) participated. Experiment 1 measured contrast sensitivity to increments and decrements at four visual field locations. Experiments 2 and 3 measured visual temporal processing using (i) a response time (RT) task, and (ii) a temporal order judgment task. Mean RT and accuracy were collected for experiment 2, whereas experiment 3 measured temporal thresholds.
For experiment 1, the DM group showed reduced increment and decrement contrast sensitivity (F (1, 97) = 4.04, P = 0.047) especially for the central location. For experiment 2, those with DM demonstrated slower RT and lower response accuracies to increments and decrements (increments: U = 780, P = 0.01, decrements: U = 749, P = 0.005). For experiment 3, performance was similar between groups (F (1, 91) = 2.52, P = 0.137).
When assessed cross-sectionally, nonselective functional consequences of retinal neuron damage are present in early DM, particularly for foveal testing. Whether increment-decrement functional indices relate to diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression or poorer visual prognosis in DM requires further study.
动物模型表明,ON 视网膜神经节细胞(RGC)可能比 OFF 细胞更容易受到糖尿病的损害。本研究使用三种心理物理学任务来推断 ON 和 OFF RGC 的功能,假设与对比度递减反应相比,对比度递增的功能反应将优先受到早期糖尿病(DM)的影响。
52 名 DM(1 型或 2 型)患者(平均年龄=34.8 岁,范围=18-60 岁)和 48 名年龄匹配的对照者(平均年龄=35.4 岁,范围=18-60 岁)参加了本研究。实验 1 测量了四个视野位置的对比度递增和递减的对比敏感度。实验 2 和 3 使用(i)反应时间(RT)任务和(ii)时间顺序判断任务来测量视觉时间处理。实验 2 收集了平均 RT 和准确率,而实验 3 则测量了时间阈值。
对于实验 1,DM 组的对比度递增和递减敏感性降低(F(1,97)=4.04,P=0.047),特别是中央位置。对于实验 2,DM 患者对递增和递减的 RT 较慢,反应准确率较低(递增:U=780,P=0.01,递减:U=749,P=0.005)。对于实验 3,两组之间的表现相似(F(1,91)=2.52,P=0.137)。
在横断面评估时,早期 DM 存在视网膜神经元损伤的非选择性功能后果,尤其是在中央视野测试中。对比度递增递减功能指数与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)进展或 DM 中较差的视觉预后之间的关系需要进一步研究。