• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟民使用戒烟应用程序的体验:系统评价。

Smokers' user experience of smoking cessation apps: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research & Policy, The University of Edinburgh, UK.

School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jul;175:105069. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105069. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105069
PMID:37084673
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore how smokers view common functions and characteristics of smoking cessation apps.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SEARCH SOURCES

CINAHL PLUS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

Seven digital databases were searched separately using relevant search terms. Search results were uploaded to Covidence. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified with the expert team in advance. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened by two reviewers independently. Any disagreements were discussed in research meetings. Pertinent data were extracted and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Findings were presented in a narrative approach.

RESULTS

28 studies were included in this review. The overarching themes were app functionality and app characteristics. Under app "functionality", six subthemes emerged: 1) education; 2) tracking; 3) social support; 4) compensation; 5) distraction, and 6) reminding. Under "app characteristics", five subthemes emerged: 1) simplification, 2) personalisation, 3) diverse content forms, 4) interactivity, and 5) privacy and security.

CONCLUSION

Understanding user needs and expectations is crucial for developing a programme theory for smoking cessation app interventions. Relevant needs identified in this review should be linked to broader theories of smoking cessation and app-based intervention.

摘要

目的

探讨吸烟者如何看待戒烟应用程序的常见功能和特点。

设计

系统评价。

检索源

CINAHL PLUS、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、IEEE Xplore、ACM 数字图书馆和 Google Scholar。

检索方法

分别使用相关检索词在七个数字数据库中进行检索。搜索结果上传至 Covidence。纳入和排除标准由专家团队预先确定。由两名评审员独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。任何分歧均在研究会议上进行讨论。使用定性内容分析提取和分析相关数据。结果以叙述方式呈现。

结果

本综述纳入了 28 项研究。主要主题是应用程序功能和应用程序特征。在应用程序“功能”下,出现了六个子主题:1)教育;2)跟踪;3)社会支持;4)补偿;5)分心;6)提醒。在“应用程序特征”下,出现了五个子主题:1)简化;2)个性化;3)多样化的内容形式;4)互动性;5)隐私和安全性。

结论

了解用户需求和期望对于开发戒烟应用程序干预计划的理论框架至关重要。本综述中确定的相关需求应与更广泛的戒烟理论和基于应用程序的干预措施联系起来。

相似文献

1
Smokers' user experience of smoking cessation apps: A systematic review.烟民使用戒烟应用程序的体验:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jul;175:105069. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105069. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
3
Researched Apps Used in Dementia Care for People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Systematic Review on App Features, Security, and Usability.用于痴呆症患者及其非专业照护者的痴呆症照护研究型应用程序:关于应用程序功能、安全性和可用性的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 12;25:e46188. doi: 10.2196/46188.
4
Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.基于手机的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub3.
5
Nicotine vaccines for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的尼古丁疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007072.pub2.
6
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
7
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
8
Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.基于手机的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 10;4(4):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4.
9
Effectiveness of eHealth Smoking Cessation Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康戒烟干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e45111. doi: 10.2196/45111.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quitline Queensland: the journey to a globally unique smoking cessation service in Australia.昆士兰戒烟热线:在澳大利亚迈向全球独一无二戒烟服务的历程。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 8;13:1576541. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576541. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Ecological Momentary Assessment Participation on Short-Term Smoking Cessation: quitSTART Ecological Momentary Assessment Incentivization Randomized Trial.生态瞬时评估参与对短期戒烟的影响:quitSTART生态瞬时评估激励随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 18;27:e67630. doi: 10.2196/67630.
3
The impact of gamification on smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
游戏化对戒烟的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Jun 26;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/203937. eCollection 2025.
4
Perceptions Toward an Attentional Bias Modification Mobile Game Among Individuals With Low Socioeconomic Status Who Smoke: Qualitative Study.社会经济地位低下的吸烟者对一款注意力偏差修正手机游戏的看法:定性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2025 May 9;13:e59515. doi: 10.2196/59515.
5
Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals.探索关于数字戒烟即时自适应干预措施的观点:一项针对成年吸烟者和戒烟专业人员的焦点小组研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 2;4(5):e0000705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000705. eCollection 2025 May.
6
User Perceptions of E-Cigarette Cessation Apps: Content Analysis of App Reviews.用户对电子烟戒烟应用程序的看法:应用程序评论的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 15;27:e59997. doi: 10.2196/59997.
7
Tales of hope and hesitation: Smoking cessation experts' views on the opportunities and risks of digital behaviour change interventions.希望与犹豫的故事:戒烟专家对数字行为改变干预措施的机遇与风险的看法。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 23;11:20552076251322060. doi: 10.1177/20552076251322060. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
A feature-based qualitative assessment of smoking cessation mobile applications.基于特征的戒烟移动应用程序定性评估
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 21;3(11):e0000658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000658. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Optimizing the Measurement of Information on the Context of Alcohol Consumption Within the Drink Less App Among People Drinking at Increasing and Higher Risk Levels: Mixed-Methods Usability Study.在 Drink Less App 中优化对饮酒量增加和风险水平较高人群饮酒背景信息的测量:混合方法可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 24;8:e50131. doi: 10.2196/50131.
10
Perceptions of the Use of Mobile Technologies for Smoking Cessation: Focus Group Study With Individuals of Low Socioeconomic Status Who Smoke.使用移动技术戒烟的看法:对社会经济地位较低的吸烟者进行焦点小组研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 11;8:e58221. doi: 10.2196/58221.