Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 15006, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Children's Heart Centre, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2024 Mar;25(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s10561-023-10088-y. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
Reconstruction of right ventricular outflow tract in patients with congenital heart disease in various age groups remains a controversial issue. Currently, a little is known about the fate of secondary and subsequent conduit. The aim of the study was to determine risk factors of conduit failure, evaluate long-term conduit survival, find out which type of conduit should be preferred in case of reoperations. We performed a retrospective analysis of a total of 249 records of valved conduit secondary and subsequent replacement in right ventricular outflow tract in 197 patients. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. The study endpoints were defined as conduit explants; balloon dilatation of the graft (excluding balloon dilatation of left/right pulmonary artery), transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation; heart transplantation or death of the patient. There were total of 21 deaths (11% mortality) among 197 patients during the follow-up, 2 patients underwent heart transplant, in 23 implanted conduits pulmonary angioplasty or/including transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation was afterwards performed due to graft failure, conduit had to be explanted in 46 cases. After 28 years follow-up, freedom from graft failure after 5 years was 77%, 48% after 10 years and 21% after 15 years. Reoperative right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction demonstrates good mid-term and acceptable long-term outcomes regardless of the type of conduit implanted. Worse long-term graft survival of secondary and further conduits is associated with younger age of the recipient at implantation, small size of the conduit, younger age of donor and male donor in case of allograft implantation.
在不同年龄组的先天性心脏病患者中,右心室流出道的重建仍然是一个有争议的问题。目前,对于二次和后续管道的命运知之甚少。本研究旨在确定管道失效的危险因素,评估长期管道存活率,找出在再次手术时应优先选择哪种类型的管道。我们对 197 例患者的 249 例有瓣管道二次和后续右心室流出道置换的记录进行了回顾性分析。中位随访时间为 5.7 年。研究终点定义为管道移植物;移植物(不包括左/右肺动脉球囊扩张)的球囊扩张;经导管肺动脉瓣植入;心脏移植或患者死亡。在 197 例患者的随访中,共有 21 例(11%死亡率)死亡,2 例患者接受心脏移植,23 例植入的管道由于移植物失功,随后进行了肺动脉扩张术或/包括经导管肺动脉瓣植入术,46 例需要进行管道置换。在 28 年的随访后,5 年后的无移植物失败率为 77%,10 年后为 48%,15 年后为 21%。无论植入的管道类型如何,再次进行右心室流出道重建都显示出良好的中期和可接受的长期结果。二次和进一步的管道的长期移植物存活率较差与植入时受体的年龄较小、管道尺寸较小、供体年龄较小以及同种异体移植时供体为男性有关。