Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Orthopaedics, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 22;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06403-z.
Multiple surgical interventions exist for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, but the surgeon and patient may often have difficulty deciding which interventions are the best option.
We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared complications, revisions, reoperations, and functional outcomes among TKA (total knee arthroplasty), UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), HTO (high tibial osteotomy), BCA (bicompartmental knee arthroplasty), BIU (bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), and KJD (knee joint distraction). The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for all studies comparing two or more surgical interventions. Direct-comparison meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed to combine direct and indirect evidence. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.
This NMA and systematic review included 21 studies (17 RCTs), with a total of 1749 patients. The overall risk-of-bias assessment of the RCTs revealed that 7 studies had low risk, 5 had some concerns, and 9 had high risk. SUCRA (the surface under the cumulative ranking curve) rankings revealed that KJD had the greatest risk of appearing postoperative complications, revisions, and reoperations, and UKA or TKA had the lowest risk. The majority of comparisons among various treatments showed no difference for functional outcomes.
Each surgical intervention is noninferior to other treatments in functional outcomes, but UKA and TKA are better options to treat OA according to SUCRA rankings by comparing complications, revisions, and reoperations. KJD is an imperfect option for treating OA. Other treatments should be carefully considered for each patient in accordance with their actual conditions. However, this conclusion is limited by the selection of reviewed publications and individual variation of surgical indications for patients.
This study was registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry1395).
针对有症状的膝骨关节炎,有多种手术干预方法,但外科医生和患者常常难以确定哪种干预方法最佳。
我们进行了系统评价,以确定比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)、单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)、胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)、双间室膝关节置换术(BCA)、双单间室膝关节置换术(BIU)和膝关节牵张术(KJD)之间并发症、翻修、再次手术和功能结局的随机临床试验(RCT)。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以获取所有比较两种或更多种手术干预方法的研究。我们进行了直接比较荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以合并直接和间接证据。使用改良的 Cochrane RCT 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
这项 NMA 和系统评价纳入了 21 项研究(17 项 RCT),共纳入 1749 名患者。RCT 的总体偏倚风险评估显示,7 项研究为低风险,5 项为存在一定担忧,9 项为高风险。SUCRA(累积排序曲线下面积)排名显示,KJD 术后并发症、翻修和再次手术的风险最高,UKA 或 TKA 的风险最低。各种治疗方法之间的大多数比较在功能结局方面没有差异。
在功能结局方面,每种手术干预都不劣于其他治疗方法,但根据 SUCRA 排名,UKA 和 TKA 在比较并发症、翻修和再次手术时是治疗 OA 的更好选择。KJD 是治疗 OA 的不理想选择。应根据患者的实际情况,为每位患者仔细考虑其他治疗方法。然而,这一结论受到所审查出版物的选择和患者手术适应证的个体差异的限制。
本研究已在 Research Registry(reviewregistry1395)注册。