• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学前阶段语用能力的个体差异视角

An individual differences perspective on pragmatic abilities in the preschool years.

作者信息

Bohn Manuel, Tessler Michael Henry, Kordt Clara, Hausmann Tom, Frank Michael C

机构信息

Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

DeepMind, London, UK.

出版信息

Dev Sci. 2023 Nov;26(6):e13401. doi: 10.1111/desc.13401. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1111/desc.13401
PMID:37089076
Abstract

Pragmatic abilities are fundamental to successful language use and learning. Individual differences studies contribute to understanding the psychological processes involved in pragmatic reasoning. Small sample sizes, insufficient measurement tools, and a lack of theoretical precision have hindered progress, however. Three studies addressed these challenges in three- to 5-year-old German-speaking children (N = 228, 121 female). Studies 1 and 2 assessed the psychometric properties of six pragmatics tasks. Study 3 investigated relations among pragmatics tasks and between pragmatics and other cognitive abilities. The tasks were found to measure stable variation between individuals. Via a computational cognitive model, individual differences were traced back to a latent pragmatics construct. This presents the basis for understanding the relations between pragmatics and other cognitive abilities. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Individual differences in pragmatic abilities are important to understanding variation in language development. Research in this domain lacks a precise theoretical framework and psychometrically high-quality measures. We present six tasks capturing a wide range of pragmatic abilities with excellent re-test reliability. We use a computational cognitive model to provide a substantive theory of individual differences in pragmatic abilities.

摘要

语用能力是成功运用和学习语言的基础。个体差异研究有助于理解语用推理所涉及的心理过程。然而,样本量小、测量工具不足以及理论精确性的欠缺阻碍了这方面的进展。三项研究针对3至5岁的德语儿童(N = 228,其中121名为女性)应对了这些挑战。研究1和研究2评估了六项语用任务的心理测量特性。研究3调查了语用任务之间以及语用能力与其他认知能力之间的关系。结果发现这些任务能够测量个体之间稳定的差异。通过一个计算认知模型,个体差异被追溯到一个潜在的语用结构。这为理解语用能力与其他认知能力之间的关系奠定了基础。研究亮点:语用能力的个体差异对于理解语言发展的差异很重要。该领域的研究缺乏精确的理论框架和心理测量学上高质量的测量方法。我们提出了六项任务,它们能够涵盖广泛的语用能力,且重测信度极佳。我们使用一个计算认知模型来提供关于语用能力个体差异的实质性理论。

相似文献

1
An individual differences perspective on pragmatic abilities in the preschool years.学前阶段语用能力的个体差异视角
Dev Sci. 2023 Nov;26(6):e13401. doi: 10.1111/desc.13401. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
2
A Test for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS): Normative Data and Psychometric Properties.实用能力与认知基质评估测试(APACS):常模数据与心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 12;7:70. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070. eCollection 2016.
3
Specific learning disorders in young adults: Investigating pragmatic abilities and their relationship with theory of mind, executive functions and quality of life.青年特定学习障碍:探究语用能力及其与心理理论、执行功能和生活质量的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jul;126:104253. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104253. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
The communicative impairment as a core feature of schizophrenia: Frequency of pragmatic deficit, cognitive substrates, and relation with quality of life.作为精神分裂症核心特征的交流障碍:语用缺陷的频率、认知基础及其与生活质量的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;71:106-120. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Modeling Individual Differences in Children's Information Integration During Pragmatic Word Learning.语用词汇学习过程中儿童信息整合的个体差异建模
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:311-326. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00069. eCollection 2022.
6
Applying Item Response Theory (IRT) Modeling to an Observational Measure of Childhood Pragmatics: The Pragmatics Observational Measure-2.将项目反应理论(IRT)模型应用于儿童语用学的观察性测量:语用学观察测量-2。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;10:408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00408. eCollection 2019.
7
A Distinction Between Linguistic and Social Pragmatics Helps the Precise Characterization of Pragmatic Challenges in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Developmental Language Disorder.语言语用学与社会语用学的区分有助于精确刻画自闭症谱系障碍和发育性语言障碍儿童的语用挑战。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1494-1508. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00263. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Practitioner review: the assessment of language pragmatics.从业者综述:语言语用学评估
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;43(8):973-87. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00226.
9
Pragmatic aspects of verbal communication in elderly people: A study of Polish seniors.老年人言语交流的实用方面:对波兰老年人的一项研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):493-505. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12532. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
10
Pragmatic abilities in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: development of Pragmatic Abilities Questionnaire based on the Rasch rating scale model.神经发育障碍儿童的语用能力:基于拉施评分量表模型的语用能力问卷的编制
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Aug 8;12:629-639. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S209345. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action.语用学作为关于意向行动的社会推理
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Feb 8;9:290-304. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00191. eCollection 2025.
2
Cognitive Flexibility Moderates the Predictive Effect of Phonological Awareness on Focus Structures in Chinese Preschool Children.认知灵活性调节语音意识对中国学龄前儿童焦点结构的预测作用。
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 28;14(4):324. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040324.
3
Modeling Individual Differences in Children's Information Integration During Pragmatic Word Learning.
语用词汇学习过程中儿童信息整合的个体差异建模
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:311-326. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00069. eCollection 2022.