Bartley Leah, DePanfilis Diane, Bright Charlotte L
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Nov 1;2:26334895211050864. doi: 10.1177/26334895211050864. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
It has been well-documented that the degree to which interventions are implemented with fidelity in typical service settings has varied. Frequently, interventions are developed and tested in highly controlled or early adopter settings. Less attention has been given to what implementation looks like in usual care, and which factors promote practitioners' ability to implement with fidelity. Individuals and organizations implementing interventions in the real world receive varying levels of external supports and may apply a new intervention unaided. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore factors that support implementation as intended in local community agencies. In the quantitative phase of this study, 32 case planners implementing Family Connections (FC), a child maltreatment preventive intervention, completed a survey about their perceptions of practitioner and organizational factors related to fidelity. The survey data were connected to case-level fidelity scores to understand the relationship between perceptions and fidelity. The qualitative phase of this study involved further exploration with nine case planner interviews and two separate focus groups with supervisors and agency leadership. The results of this study suggest that supervision is a key contributor to a practitioner's ability to implement an intervention in usual care. The quantitative and qualitative results suggest supervision, including supervisors' perseverance, proactiveness, knowledge, availability, and skill reinforcement are important components of enhancing a practitioners' ability to learn and use FC. The quantitative results suggest that the level of education was positively associated with fidelity and perceptions of the intervention's limitations may be negatively related to implementation. Additional components that influence implementation for future research emerged from the qualitative phase related to system expectations and policies, individual practitioner attributes, and characteristics of the intervention.
This mixed-methods study sought to understand the impact of practitioner and organizational factors on fidelity of a child maltreatment prevention intervention in community-based settings. The study first asked case planners about their perceptions of practitioner and organizational factors related to fidelity through an online survey. This survey was connected to case-level fidelity scores to understand the relationship between perceptions and fidelity. The qualitative phase of this study involved further exploration with nine case planner interviews and two separate focus groups with supervisors and agency leadership. The results of this study suggest that supervision is a key contributor to a practitioner's ability to implement a maltreatment prevention intervention. Both methods of the study suggest that various aspects of supervision, including supervisors' perseverance, proactiveness, knowledge, availability, and skill reinforcement are important components of enhancing a practitioner's ability to learn and use the intervention. Additional components that influence the implementation for future research emerged from the qualitative phase related to system expectations and policies, individual practitioner attributes, and characteristics of the intervention.
有充分文献记载,在典型服务环境中干预措施忠实执行的程度各不相同。通常,干预措施是在高度可控或早期采用者环境中开发和测试的。对于常规护理中的实施情况以及哪些因素促进从业者忠实执行的能力,关注较少。在现实世界中实施干预措施的个人和组织获得的外部支持水平各不相同,并且可能在没有帮助的情况下应用新的干预措施。这项混合方法研究的目的是探索在当地社区机构中支持按预期实施的因素。在本研究的定量阶段,32名实施预防儿童虐待干预措施“家庭联系”(FC)的个案规划师完成了一项关于他们对与忠实度相关的从业者和组织因素看法的调查。调查数据与个案层面的忠实度得分相关联,以了解看法与忠实度之间的关系。本研究的定性阶段包括对9名个案规划师进行进一步访谈,以及与主管和机构领导进行两个单独的焦点小组讨论。本研究结果表明,监督是从业者在常规护理中实施干预措施能力的关键促成因素。定量和定性结果表明,监督,包括主管的毅力、积极性、知识、可及性和技能强化,是提高从业者学习和使用FC能力的重要组成部分。定量结果表明,教育水平与忠实度呈正相关,对干预措施局限性的看法可能与实施呈负相关。定性阶段出现了与系统期望和政策、个体从业者属性以及干预措施特征相关的、对未来研究有影响的其他组成部分。
这项混合方法研究旨在了解从业者和组织因素对社区环境中预防儿童虐待干预措施忠实度的影响。该研究首先通过在线调查询问个案规划师对与忠实度相关的从业者和组织因素的看法。该调查与个案层面的忠实度得分相关联,以了解看法与忠实度之间的关系。本研究的定性阶段包括对9名个案规划师进行进一步访谈,以及与主管和机构领导进行两个单独的焦点小组讨论。本研究结果表明,监督是从业者实施虐待预防干预措施能力的关键促成因素。该研究的两种方法都表明,监督的各个方面,包括主管的毅力、积极性、知识、可及性和技能强化,是提高从业者学习和使用该干预措施能力的重要组成部分。定性阶段出现了与系统期望和政策、个体从业者属性以及干预措施特征相关的、对未来研究有影响的其他组成部分。