Yuliastuti Fitriana, Andayani Tri Murti, Endarti Dwi, Kristina Susi Ari
Doctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, Indonesia.
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2023 Jan-Mar;21(1):2768. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2023.1.2768. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
In Indonesia, the cost of cancer treatment has been determined by the Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBGs) based on a code called the INA-CBG's rates. However, a fair claim should be based on the severity of the disease and the class of treatment in the hospital, not on the rates of code. In fact, the real cost of therapy for cancer is influenced by several factors including stage, comorbidity, and severity (INA-CBGs coding, type of hospital, hospital class, treatment grade, side effects, and length of stay), so in many cases, there are reported differences between the real costs and the INA-CBGs rates charged to patients.
This study aims to investigate the difference between real treatment costs and INA-CBG's rates for cases of lung cancer, cervical cancer, and breast cancer at a cancer center hospital in Indonesia.
This work uses an observational study, and the data were taken retrospectively from hospital financial data and patient medical records. The data were then analyzed using a one-sample t-test to determine the difference between real costs and INA-CBGs costs.
The results showed that there was no significant difference between real costs and INA-CBG's cost on stage II lung cancer treatment in grade 2 with a sig. value of 0.683; code C-4-13-II in grade 3 with a sig. value of 0.151; and code C-4-13-III in grade 3 with a sig. value of 0.650; where the significance level (t alpha) is more than 0.05. Furthermore, the treatment costs for cervical cancer with codes C-4-13-I and C-4-13-II in grade 1 had sig. values of 0.155 and 0.720 respectively. Lastly, the treatment cost for breast cancer patients with codes C-4-12-II in grade 3 had a sig. value of 0.145 and code C-4-13-II in grade 3 showed a sig. value of 0.091.
Although statistical evaluation showed a significant difference for some cases and not significant for other cases, in real conditions, there is a difference between the INA-CBGs and the real costs that must be evaluated by the government and stakeholders to provide justice for cancer patients.
在印度尼西亚,癌症治疗费用由印度尼西亚病例基准组(INA - CBGs)根据一种名为INA - CBG费率的编码来确定。然而,合理的索赔应该基于疾病的严重程度和医院的治疗等级,而非编码费率。实际上,癌症治疗的实际费用受多种因素影响,包括分期、合并症和严重程度(INA - CBG编码、医院类型、医院等级、治疗级别、副作用和住院时间),所以在许多情况下,报告显示实际费用与向患者收取的INA - CBG费率之间存在差异。
本研究旨在调查印度尼西亚一家癌症中心医院肺癌、宫颈癌和乳腺癌病例的实际治疗费用与INA - CBG费率之间的差异。
本研究采用观察性研究,数据回顾性取自医院财务数据和患者病历。然后使用单样本t检验分析数据,以确定实际费用与INA - CBG费用之间的差异。
结果显示,在2级的II期肺癌治疗中,实际费用与INA - CBG费用之间无显著差异,显著性值为0.683;在3级的代码C - 4 - 13 - II中,显著性值为0.151;在3级的代码C - 4 - 13 - III中,显著性值为0.650;其中显著性水平(tα)大于0.05。此外,1级代码C - 4 - 13 - I和C - 4 - 13 - II的宫颈癌治疗费用,显著性值分别为0.155和0.720。最后,3级代码C - 4 - 12 - II的乳腺癌患者治疗费用,显著性值为0.145,3级代码C - 4 - 13 - II的显著性值为0.091。
尽管统计评估显示某些病例存在显著差异,而其他病例无显著差异,但在实际情况中,INA - CBG与实际费用之间存在差异,政府和利益相关者必须对此进行评估,以便为癌症患者提供公平待遇。