Economou Melina A, Kaiser Bonnie N, Yoeun Sara W, Crable Erika L, McMenamin Sara B
Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Global Health Program, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Apr 28;3:26334895221096289. doi: 10.1177/26334895221096289. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) released an "All Plan Letter" (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage among Medicaid beneficiaries. However, implementation remains poor. We apply the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to fidelity to APL 16-014 across California Medicaid MCPs.
We assessed fidelity through semi-structured interviews with MCP health educators ( = 24). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and reviewed to develop initial themes regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation. Initial thematic summaries were discussed and mapped onto EPIS constructs.
The APL (Innovation) was described as lacking clarity and specificity in its guidelines, hindering implementation. Related to the Inner Context, MCPs described the APL as beyond the scope of their resources, pointing to their own lack of educational materials, human resources, and poor technological infrastructure as implementation barriers. In the Outer Context, MCPs identified a lack of incentives for providers and beneficiaries to offer and participate in tobacco-cessation programs, respectively. A lack of communication, educational materials, and training resources between the state and MCPs (missing Bridging Factors) were barriers to preventing MCPs from identifying smoking rates or gauging success of tobacco-cessation efforts. Facilitators included several MCPs collaborating with each other and using external resources to promote tobacco cessation. Additionally, a few MCPs used fidelity monitoring staff as Bridging Factors to facilitate provider training, track providers' identification of smokers, and follow-up with beneficiaries participating in tobacco-cessation programs.
The release of the evidence-based APL 16-014 by California's DHCS was an important step forward in promoting tobacco-cessation services for Medicaid MCP beneficiaries. Improved communication on implementation in different environments and improved Bridging Factors such as incentives for providers and patients are needed to fully realize policy goals.
In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) in California released an "All Plan Letter" (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage to address tobacco use among Medicaid beneficiaries. We conducted semi-structured interviews with health educators in California Medicaid MCPs to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing the APL using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. According to MCPs, barriers included a lack of clarity in the APL guidelines; a lack of resources, including educational materials, infrastructure to identify smokers, and human resources; and a lack of incentives or penalties for providers to provide tobacco-cessation materials to beneficiaries. Facilitators included collaboration between MCPs and state and/or national public health programs. Overall, our findings can provide avenues for improving the implementation of tobacco-cessation services within Medicaid MCPs.
2016年,加利福尼亚医疗保健服务部(DHCS)向其医疗补助管理式医疗计划(MCP)发布了一份“全计划信函”(APL 16 - 014),为在医疗补助受益人中实施戒烟覆盖范围提供指导。然而,实施情况仍然不佳。我们应用探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架来确定加利福尼亚医疗补助MCP中忠实执行APL 16 - 014的障碍和促进因素。
我们通过对MCP健康教育工作者进行半结构化访谈(n = 24)来评估忠实度。访谈进行了录音、转录和审查,以形成关于实施障碍和促进因素的初始主题。对初始主题总结进行了讨论,并映射到EPIS结构上。
APL(创新)在其指南中被描述为缺乏清晰度和具体性,这阻碍了实施。与内部环境相关,MCP表示APL超出了其资源范围,指出自身缺乏教育材料、人力资源以及技术基础设施薄弱是实施障碍。在外部环境方面,MCP指出分别缺乏激励措施促使提供者提供和受益人参与戒烟计划。州与MCP之间缺乏沟通、教育材料和培训资源(缺失衔接因素)是阻碍MCP确定吸烟率或衡量戒烟工作成效的障碍。促进因素包括几个MCP相互协作并利用外部资源来促进戒烟。此外,一些MCP将忠实度监测人员用作衔接因素,以促进提供者培训、跟踪提供者对吸烟者的识别,并对参与戒烟计划的受益人进行随访。
加利福尼亚DHCS发布基于证据的APL 16 - 014是向前迈出的重要一步,有助于为医疗补助MCP受益人推广戒烟服务。需要在不同环境中改善关于实施的沟通,并改善诸如对提供者和患者的激励措施等衔接因素,以充分实现政策目标。
2016年,加利福尼亚的医疗保健服务部(DHCS)向其医疗补助管理式医疗计划(MCP)发布了一份“全计划信函”(APL 16 - 014),为实施戒烟覆盖范围以解决医疗补助受益人中的烟草使用问题提供指导。我们对加利福尼亚医疗补助MCP中的健康教育工作者进行了半结构化访谈,以使用探索、准备、实施、维持框架来探索实施APL的障碍和促进因素。据MCP称,障碍包括APL指南缺乏清晰度;缺乏资源,包括教育材料、识别吸烟者的基础设施和人力资源;以及缺乏激励措施或惩罚措施促使提供者向受益人提供戒烟材料。促进因素包括MCP与州和/或国家公共卫生计划之间的合作。总体而言,我们的研究结果可为改善医疗补助MCP中戒烟服务的实施提供途径。