Olman Cheryl A
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Apr 6;17:1134811. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1134811. eCollection 2023.
Despite technology advances that have enabled routine acquisition of functional MRI data with sub-millimeter resolution, the inferences that cognitive neuroscientists must make to link fMRI data to behavior are complicated. Thus, a single dataset subjected to different analyses can be interpreted in different ways. This article presents two optical analogies that can be useful for framing fMRI analyses in a way that allows for multiple interpretations of fMRI data to be valid simultaneously without undermining each other. The first is reflection: when an object is reflected in a mirrored surface, it appears as if the reflected object is sharing space with the mirrored object, but of course it is not. This analogy can be a good guide for interpreting the fMRI signal, since even at sub-millimeter resolutions the signal is determined by a mixture of local and long-range neural computations. The second is refraction. If we view an object through a multi-faceted prism or gemstone, our view will change-sometimes dramatically-depending on our viewing angle. In the same way, interpretation of fMRI data (inference of underlying neuronal activity) can and should be different depending on the analysis approach. Rather than representing a weakness of the methodology, or the superiority of one approach over the other (for example, simple regression analysis versus multi-voxel pattern analysis), this is an expected consequence of how information is multiplexed in the neural networks of the brain: multiple streams of information are simultaneously present in each location. The fact that any one analysis typically shows only one view of the data also puts some parentheses around fMRI practitioners' constant search for ground truth against which to compare their data. By holding our interpretations lightly and understanding that many interpretations of the data can all be true at the same time, we do a better job of preparing ourselves to appreciate, and eventually understand, the complexity of the brain and the behavior it produces.
尽管技术进步已使人们能够常规获取具有亚毫米分辨率的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据,但认知神经科学家为将fMRI数据与行为联系起来而必须做出的推断却很复杂。因此,同一数据集经过不同分析可能会有不同的解读方式。本文提出了两个光学类比,它们有助于以一种能让fMRI数据的多种解读同时成立且互不矛盾的方式来构建fMRI分析。第一个是反射:当一个物体在镜面上反射时,看起来反射出的物体似乎与镜面物体共享空间,但实际上并非如此。这个类比可以很好地指导对fMRI信号的解读,因为即使在亚毫米分辨率下,信号也是由局部和远程神经计算的混合所决定的。第二个是折射。如果我们通过多面棱镜或宝石观察一个物体,我们的视角会发生变化——有时变化很大——这取决于我们的观察角度。同样,对fMRI数据的解读(对潜在神经元活动的推断)根据分析方法的不同可以而且应该有所不同。这并非代表该方法存在缺陷,也不是一种方法优于另一种方法(例如,简单回归分析与多体素模式分析),而是大脑神经网络中信息多路复用的预期结果:每个位置同时存在多个信息流。任何一种分析通常只显示数据的一种视图这一事实,也给fMRI从业者不断寻求用以与他们的数据进行比较的基本事实加上了一些限制。通过不过分执着于我们的解读,并理解数据的多种解读可以同时都是正确的,我们就能更好地准备去领会并最终理解大脑及其产生的行为的复杂性。