Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders and Gait, Parkinson's Foundation Center of Excellence, Monash Health, Kingston Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2023;13(4):609-617. doi: 10.3233/JPD-225117.
Tablet formulations of Parkinson's disease (PD) medications may become ineffective at managing motor fluctuations in advanced PD. The liquid formulation, levodopa carbidopa ascorbic acid solution, or LCAS, is an effective and inexpensive treatment for motor fluctuations however it remains underutilized.
We compared the efficacy of LCAS with tablet formulations and Duodopa jejunal infusion through routine inpatient management using hourly functional status measures, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). The TUG differentiates between 'off' and 'on' states and quantifies motor fluctuations.
Experienced nurses used the TUG times and functional observations recorded hourly throughout the waking day to optimize the LCAS hourly dose and the Duodopa flow rate over several days. When patients were stabilized on each of the interventions, the TUG measures were then recorded to compare the outcomes of the interventions.
Twenty-six participants had TUG times recorded while on one or more of the formulations: 19 had TUG times recorded on tablets, 23 on LCAS and 10 on Duodopa. TUG times on LCAS and Duodopa were significantly faster compared to tablets (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001 respectively). Severity of dyskinesia was not significantly different between formulations (p = 0.35). Daily dose for the three formulations and the hourly doses for LCAS and Duodopa did not differ significantly (p = 0.37, p = 0.19 respectively).
This report demonstrated the efficacy of LCAS for improving motor complications and its equivalency with Duodopa jejunal infusion.
帕金森病(PD)药物的片剂制剂在管理晚期 PD 的运动波动方面可能变得无效。左旋多巴卡比多巴抗坏血酸溶液(LCAS)的液体制剂是一种有效且廉价的治疗运动波动的方法,但仍未得到充分利用。
我们通过使用每小时功能状态测量(计时起立行走测试(TUG)),即常规住院管理,比较 LCAS 与片剂制剂和 Duodopa 空肠输注的疗效。TUG 可区分“关”和“开”状态,并量化运动波动。
经验丰富的护士使用 TUG 时间和功能观察结果,在清醒的一天中每小时记录,以优化 LCAS 每小时剂量和 Duodopa 流速,持续数天。当患者在每种干预措施下稳定后,记录 TUG 测量值以比较干预措施的结果。
26 名参与者的 TUG 时间记录在一种或多种制剂上:19 名参与者的 TUG 时间记录在片剂上,23 名在 LCAS 上,10 名在 Duodopa 上。LCAS 和 Duodopa 的 TUG 时间明显快于片剂(p<0.0001,p=0.001)。三种制剂之间的运动障碍严重程度无显著差异(p=0.35)。三种制剂的每日剂量以及 LCAS 和 Duodopa 的每小时剂量均无显著差异(p=0.37,p=0.19)。
本报告证明了 LCAS 改善运动并发症的疗效及其与 Duodopa 空肠输注的等效性。