Trauma Unit and Emergency Department, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute.
Avvocato del Foro di Monza, Italy.
Acta Biomed. 2023 Apr 24;94(2):e2023110. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i2.14207.
The article aims to outline the current scenario relative to the medical role in end-of-life issues. In order to do this, historical-legal references have been drawn upon relating to technical, legal and scientific thought and doctrine, as it has come down to us in the medical field through the evolution of ethical and philosophical frameworks.
The authors have conducted a thorough analysis of end-of-life legislative initiatives, in Italy and across the EU, and court rulings to outline possible ways to harmonize and reconcile the current medical ethics frameworks with the needs and rights of all, especially the most vulnerable among us. To that end, the necessary operational choices and adjustments have not yet been made by our legal system, from a technical, as well as moral, standpoint.
An operational proposal has therefore been laid out to protect both healthcare providers and patients, in a relationship that goes beyond treatment in the strict sense, which prioritizes mutual needs as an integral part of a common, essential path.
In order for doctors to consider themselves complete, they should in fact deal not only with life, but also with death.
本文旨在概述当前与生命末期医疗角色相关的情况。为此,我们参考了历史法律文献,涉及技术、法律和科学思想和学说,这些思想和学说通过伦理和哲学框架的演变在医学领域得以传承。
作者对意大利和欧盟的生命末期立法倡议以及法院裁决进行了全面分析,旨在为协调和调和当前的医学伦理框架与所有人的需求和权利,尤其是我们中间最脆弱的人群的需求和权利,找出可能的方法。为此,从技术和道德的角度来看,我们的法律体系尚未做出必要的操作选择和调整。
因此,提出了一项操作提案,以保护医疗保健提供者和患者,在这种关系中,超越了严格意义上的治疗,将相互需求作为共同基本路径的一个组成部分加以优先考虑。
为了使医生能够认为自己是完整的,他们实际上不仅应该处理生命问题,还应该处理死亡问题。