From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY.
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Apr 1;90(4):376-379. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002807.
Women represent greater than 50% of medical students in America and are becoming increasingly well represented in surgical fields. However, parity at the trainee level has yet to be accomplished, and surgical leadership positions have remained disproportionately biased toward men. To date, there have been no comparisons on the progress within plastic surgery and other surgical specialties. This investigates the gender disparity in resident and leadership representation over the past 10 years within surgical specialties and how these disparities compare to plastic surgery.
Counts of female and male residents and surgical society leaders were collected from 2008 to 2018. Surgical fields included plastic, vascular, urologic, neurologic, orthopedic, cardiothoracic, and general surgery. Leadership positions were defined as board seats on executive committees of major surgical societies or board associations. Data were acquired from publicly available sources or provided directly from the organizations. Resident data were obtained from the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education residents' reports. Individuals holding more than 1 leadership position within a year were counted only once.
In our aggregated analysis, the proportion of women in surgical leadership lags behind women in surgical residency training across all specialties (13.2% vs 27.3%, P < 0.01). General surgery had the highest proportion of female residents and leaders (35% and 18.8%, P < 0.01), followed by plastic (32.2% and 17.3%, P < 0.01), vascular (28.2% and 11.3%, P < 0.01), urologic (24.3% and 5.1%), and cardiothoracic surgery (20.5% and 7.8%, P < 0.01). Women in surgical leadership, however, increased at a faster rate than women in surgical training (11% vs 7%, P < 0.05). Plastic surgery showed the greatest rate of increase in both residents and leaders (17% and 19%, P < 0.05) followed by cardiothoracic surgery (16% and 9%, P < 0.05) and general surgery (8% and 14%, P < 0.05). For neurologic and orthopedic surgery, neither the difference in proportions between residents and leaders nor the yearly growth of these groups were significant.
Between 2008 and 2018, women in plastic surgery training and leadership positions have shown the most significant growth compared with other surgical subspecialties, demonstrating a strong concerted effort toward gender equality among surgical professions.
在美国,女性占医学专业学生的 50%以上,并且在外科领域的代表性越来越强。然而,在受训人员层面上,性别平等仍未实现,外科领导职位仍然严重偏向男性。迄今为止,还没有对过去 10 年在整形外科学和其他外科专业中取得的进展进行比较。本研究调查了过去 10 年在外科专业中,住院医师和领导代表中性别差距的情况,以及这些差距与整形外科学相比如何。
从 2008 年到 2018 年,收集了女性和男性住院医师和外科协会领导的人数。外科领域包括整形、血管、泌尿科、神经科、骨科、心胸外科和普通外科。领导职位被定义为在主要外科协会或董事会协会的执行委员会中担任董事会席位。数据来自公开来源或直接从组织获得。住院医师数据来自研究生医学教育认证委员会的住院医师报告。在一年内担任多个领导职位的个人只计算一次。
在我们的综合分析中,与外科住院医师培训中的女性比例相比,所有外科专业的外科领导中的女性比例都滞后(13.2%比 27.3%,P<0.01)。普通外科的女性住院医师和领导比例最高(35%和 18.8%,P<0.01),其次是整形(32.2%和 17.3%,P<0.01),血管(28.2%和 11.3%,P<0.01),泌尿科(24.3%和 5.1%)和心胸外科(20.5%和 7.8%,P<0.01)。然而,外科领导中的女性人数增长速度快于外科培训中的女性人数(11%比 7%,P<0.05)。整形外科学在住院医师和领导人数方面的增长率最高(17%和 19%,P<0.05),其次是心胸外科(16%和 9%,P<0.05)和普通外科(8%和 14%,P<0.05)。对于神经外科和骨科,住院医师和领导之间的比例差异以及这些群体的年增长率都没有显著差异。
在 2008 年至 2018 年期间,与其他外科专业相比,整形外科学培训和领导职位的女性人数增长最为显著,这表明外科专业在性别平等方面做出了强有力的共同努力。