• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如果你的患者从谷歌医生转向了 ChatGPT 医生,你会怎么办?基于病例的调查,评估 ChatGPT 生成的健康问题回答的可信度、价值和危险。

What if your patient switches from Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT? A vignette-based survey of the trustworthiness, value, and danger of ChatGPT-generated responses to health questions.

机构信息

KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 PB7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Leuvenseweg 38, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 Jan 12;23(1):95-98. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad038.

DOI:10.1093/eurjcn/zvad038
PMID:37094282
Abstract

ChatGPT is a new artificial intelligence system that revolutionizes the way how information can be sought and obtained. In this study, the trustworthiness, value, and danger of ChatGPT-generated responses on four vignettes that represented virtual patient questions were evaluated by 20 experts in the domain of congenital heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, or cholesterol. Experts generally considered ChatGPT-generated responses trustworthy and valuable, with few considering them dangerous. Forty percent of the experts found ChatGPT responses more valuable than Google. Experts appreciated the sophistication and nuances in the responses but also recognized that responses were often incomplete and sometimes misleading.

摘要

ChatGPT 是一种新的人工智能系统,它彻底改变了人们获取信息的方式。在这项研究中,20 名先天性心脏病、心房颤动、心力衰竭或胆固醇领域的专家评估了 ChatGPT 生成的对四个虚拟患者问题的回答的可信度、价值和危险程度。专家们普遍认为 ChatGPT 生成的回复是可信和有价值的,只有少数人认为它们有危险。40%的专家认为 ChatGPT 的回复比谷歌更有价值。专家们赞赏回复的复杂性和细微差别,但也认识到回复往往不完整,有时甚至具有误导性。

相似文献

1
What if your patient switches from Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT? A vignette-based survey of the trustworthiness, value, and danger of ChatGPT-generated responses to health questions.如果你的患者从谷歌医生转向了 ChatGPT 医生,你会怎么办?基于病例的调查,评估 ChatGPT 生成的健康问题回答的可信度、价值和危险。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 Jan 12;23(1):95-98. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad038.
2
Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.谷歌医生与ChatGPT医生:通过比较关于白内障及白内障手术的常见患者问题的回答的准确性、安全性和可读性,探索人工智能在眼科领域的应用。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;39(6):472-479. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2326058. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Artificial intelligence chatbots as sources of patient education material for obstructive sleep apnoea: ChatGPT versus Google Bard.人工智能聊天机器人作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者教育材料的来源:ChatGPT 与 Google Bard 对比。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08319-9. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
ChatGPT vs Google for Queries Related to Dementia and Other Cognitive Decline: Comparison of Results.ChatGPT 与谷歌在痴呆症和其他认知能力下降相关查询上的对比:结果比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 25;25:e48966. doi: 10.2196/48966.
5
How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.人工智能如何回答常见肺癌问题:ChatGPT 与 Google Bard 对比。
Radiology. 2023 Jun;307(5):e230922. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230922.
6
Using a Google Web Search Analysis to Assess the Utility of ChatGPT in Total Joint Arthroplasty.利用谷歌网页搜索分析评估 ChatGPT 在全关节置换中的效用。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
7
Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard.比较分析 ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4.0 和谷歌巴德在近视防控方面的表现:大型语言模型的基准测试。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Sep;95:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104770. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Using ChatGPT and Google Bard to improve the readability of written patient information: a proof of concept.利用 ChatGPT 和 Google Bard 提高书面患者信息的可读性:概念验证。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 Mar 12;23(2):122-126. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad087.
9
ChatGPT as a Source of Patient Information for Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Laminectomy: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search.ChatGPT 作为腰椎融合和椎板切除术患者信息的来源:与谷歌网页搜索的对比分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 1;37(10):E394-E403. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001582. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
10
Can artificial intelligence replace biochemists? A study comparing interpretation of thyroid function test results by ChatGPT and Google Bard to practising biochemists.人工智能能否取代生物化学家?一项将 ChatGPT 和 Google Bard 对甲状腺功能测试结果的解释与执业生物化学家进行比较的研究。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2024 Mar;61(2):143-149. doi: 10.1177/00045632231203473. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Biologic Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Web Search.评估ChatGPT在系统性红斑狼疮生物治疗中的效用:ChatGPT与谷歌网络搜索的比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 28;9:e76458. doi: 10.2196/76458.
2
Generative AI/LLMs for Plain Language Medical Information for Patients, Caregivers and General Public: Opportunities, Risks and Ethics.用于为患者、护理人员和普通公众提供通俗易懂的医学信息的生成式人工智能/大型语言模型:机遇、风险与伦理
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 31;19:2227-2249. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S527922. eCollection 2025.
3
Factors that influence trust and willingness to use generative AI for health information: A cross-sectional study.
影响对生成式人工智能用于健康信息的信任度和使用意愿的因素:一项横断面研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 28;11:20552076251360973. doi: 10.1177/20552076251360973. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Principles of environmental medicine: an educational case study of lead poisoning in Beethoven.环境医学原理:贝多芬铅中毒的教育案例研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 9;13:1578949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578949. eCollection 2025.
5
General practitioners' opinions of generative artificial intelligence in the UK: An online survey.英国全科医生对生成式人工智能的看法:一项在线调查。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 17;11:20552076251360863. doi: 10.1177/20552076251360863. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Generative artificial intelligence in cardiovascular specialty care: a scoping review.心血管专科护理中的生成式人工智能:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 19;24(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03594-9.
7
Digitalizing informed consent in healthcare: a scoping review.医疗保健领域的知情同意数字化:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12964-7.
8
Patient Expectations: A Qualitative Study on What Patients Want From Their Healthcare Providers to Support Them in Healthy Aging.患者期望:关于患者希望医疗服务提供者提供何种支持以实现健康老龄化的定性研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 May 21:15598276251344856. doi: 10.1177/15598276251344856.
9
Large Language Models in Action: Supporting Clinical Evaluation in an Infectious Disease Unit.大语言模型的实际应用:支持传染病科室的临床评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;13(8):879. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080879.
10
Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study.医学生和教师在医学教育中对ChatGPT的认知与早期体验:定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Feb 20;11:e63400. doi: 10.2196/63400.