促进种族公平政策的战略性信息传递:我们了解什么,我们需要学习什么?
Strategic Messaging to Promote Policies that Advance Racial Equity: What Do We Know, and What Do We Need to Learn?
机构信息
Cornell University.
Wesleyan University.
出版信息
Milbank Q. 2023 Jun;101(2):349-425. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12651. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
UNLABELLED
Policy Points Many studies have explored the impact of message strategies to build support for policies that advance racial equity, but few studies examine the effects of richer stories of lived experience and detailed accounts of the ways racism is embedded in policy design and implementation. Longer messages framed to emphasize social and structural causes of racial inequity hold significant potential to enhance support for policies to advance racial equity. There is an urgent need to develop, test, and disseminate communication interventions that center perspectives from historically marginalized people and promote policy advocacy, community mobilization, and collective action to advance racial equity.
CONTEXT
Long-standing racial inequities in health and well-being are shaped by racialized public policies that perpetuate disadvantage among Black, Brown, Indigenous, and people of color. Strategic messaging can accelerate public and policymaker support for public policies that advance population health. We lack a comprehensive understanding of lessons learned from work on policy messaging to advance racial equity and the gaps in knowledge it reveals.
METHODS
A scoping review of peer-reviewed studies from communication, psychology, political science, sociology, public health, and health policy that have tested how various message strategies influence support and mobilization for racial equity policy domains across a wide variety of social systems. We used keyword database searches, author bibliographic searches, and reviews of reference lists from relevant sources to compile 55 peer-reviewed papers with 80 studies that used experiments to test the effects of one or more message strategies in shaping support for racial equity-related policies, as well as the cognitive/emotional factors that predict their support.
FINDINGS
Most studies report on the short-term effects of very short message manipulations. Although many of these studies find evidence that reference to race or use of racial cues tend to undermine support for racial equity-related policies, the accumulated body of evidence has generally not explored the effects of richer, more nuanced stories of lived experience and/or detailed historical and contemporary accounts of the ways racism is embedded in public policy design and implementation. A few well-designed studies offer evidence that longer-form messages framed to emphasize social and structural causes of racial inequity can enhance support for policies to advance racial equity, though many questions require further research.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude by laying out a research agenda to fill numerous wide gaps in the evidentiary base related to building support for racial equity policy across sectors.
目的:探讨构建支持种族公平政策的信息策略的影响,但很少有研究考察更丰富的生活经历故事和详细说明种族主义如何嵌入政策设计和实施的方式。
背景:健康和福祉方面长期存在的种族不平等现象是由种族主义公共政策造成的,这些政策使黑种人、棕色人种、原住民和有色人种长期处于不利地位。战略信息传递可以加速公众和政策制定者对推进人口健康的公共政策的支持。我们对推进种族公平政策的信息传递工作的经验教训和知识差距缺乏全面的了解。
方法:对来自传播学、心理学、政治学、社会学、公共卫生和卫生政策领域的同行评议研究进行了范围界定审查,这些研究测试了各种信息策略如何影响广泛的社会系统中种族公平政策领域的支持和动员。我们使用关键词数据库搜索、作者文献搜索以及相关来源的参考文献审查,编制了 55 篇同行评议论文,其中 80 项研究使用实验测试了一种或多种信息策略对塑造对种族公平相关政策的支持的影响,以及预测其支持的认知/情感因素。
发现:大多数研究报告了非常短期信息处理的短期效果。尽管这些研究中的许多都发现了提到种族或使用种族线索往往会破坏对种族公平相关政策的支持的证据,但总的来说,积累的证据并没有探讨更丰富、更细微的生活经历故事和/或详细的历史和当代说明种族主义如何嵌入公共政策设计和实施的方式的影响。少数精心设计的研究提供了证据,表明强调种族不平等的社会和结构性原因的长篇信息可以增强对推进种族公平政策的支持,尽管许多问题需要进一步研究。
结论:我们最后提出了一个研究议程,以填补在多个部门建立对种族公平政策支持的证据基础方面的许多广泛差距。