University of Minnesota.
Wesleyan University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Jun 1;49(3):403-427. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11066304.
Republicans and Democrats responded to the COVID-19 pandemic in starkly different ways, from their attitudes in 2020 about whether the virus posed a threat to whether the pandemic ended in 2023. The consequences of COVID-19 for health equity have been a central concern in public health, and the concept of health equity has also been beset by partisan polarization. In this article, the authors present and discuss nationally representative survey data from 2023 on US public perceptions of disparities in COVID-19 mortality (building on a previous multiwave survey effort) as well as causal attributions for racial disparities, the contribution of structural racism, and broader attitudes about public health authority. The authors find anticipated gulfs in perspectives between Democrats on the one hand and independents and Republicans on the other. The results offer a somewhat pessimistic view of the likelihood of finding common ground in how the general public understands health inequities or the role of structural racism in perpetuating them. However, the authors show that those who acknowledge racial disparities in COVID-19 are more likely to support state public health authority to act in response to other infectious disease threats. The authors explore the implications of these public opinion data for advocacy, communication, and future needed research.
共和党人和民主党人对 COVID-19 大流行的反应截然不同,从 2020 年他们对病毒是否构成威胁的态度,到 2023 年大流行是否结束的态度。COVID-19 对健康公平的影响一直是公共卫生的核心关注点,而健康公平的概念也受到党派极化的困扰。在本文中,作者展示并讨论了 2023 年美国公众对 COVID-19 死亡率差异的看法的全国代表性调查数据(基于之前的多波调查工作),以及对种族差异的因果归因、结构性种族主义的贡献,以及对公共卫生机构的更广泛态度。作者发现,一方面是民主党人,另一方面是独立人士和共和党人,他们对观点的预期差距很大。研究结果对公众如何理解健康不平等或结构性种族主义在延续这些不平等方面的作用,以及找到共同点的可能性持较为悲观的看法。然而,作者表明,那些承认 COVID-19 中存在种族差异的人更有可能支持州公共卫生当局采取行动应对其他传染病威胁。作者探讨了这些民意调查数据对宣传、沟通和未来所需研究的影响。