Research Unit for ORL-Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 Jun;23(6):411-417. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14588. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
The objective of the current study was to examine whether physical activity and sedentary behavior were associated with appetite among community-dwelling older adults.
Cross-sectional analysis was performed on three cohort studies: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA); the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study (HABC Study) and the I'm Still Standing Study (ISS Study); (n = 1173, n = 162, n = 125; age range: 57-99, 85-95, 80-100 years; women: 51%, 56%, 61%, respectively). Physical activity and sedentary behavior were measured using hip-worn (LASA and HABC) and wrist-worn (ISS) accelerometers. Appetite was self-reported. Logistic regression models were fitted by accelerometer placement to explore the association between good appetite and various physical activity metrics (total activity, sedentary behavior, and time spent in different intensities of physical activity).
Among cohorts using hip-worn accelerometers, those having total activity within the highest tertile had more than double the odds of having good appetite compared with those within the lowest tertile (odds ratio [OR] 2.16 (1.15-4.06)). Each additional percent of daily sedentary behavior decreased the odds for having good appetite by 3% (OR 0.97 (0.95-0.996)), while each additional percent of daily light-intensity physical activity increased the odds for having good appetite by 4% (OR 1.02 (1.01-1.06)). No association was found between either physical activity or sedentary behavior and appetite for measurements with the wrist-worn accelerometers.
Among community-dwelling older adults, the associations between appetite, accelerometer-assessed physical activity and sedentary behavior differ by accelerometer placement location. This study highlights the importance of careful interpretation of accelerometer data from different body locations and concurrent health outcomes. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 411-417.
本研究旨在探讨社区老年人的体力活动和久坐行为与食欲之间的关系。
对三项队列研究进行了横断面分析:纵向老龄化研究阿姆斯特丹(LASA);健康、老龄化和身体成分研究(HABC 研究)和我仍在站立研究(ISS 研究);(n=1173,n=162,n=125;年龄范围:57-99、85-95、80-100 岁;女性:51%、56%、61%)。使用佩戴在髋部的(LASA 和 HABC)和佩戴在手腕上的(ISS)加速度计测量体力活动和久坐行为。食欲通过自我报告来评估。通过加速度计的放置位置拟合逻辑回归模型,以探索良好食欲与各种体力活动指标(总活动、久坐行为和不同强度体力活动的时间分配)之间的关系。
在使用髋部加速度计的队列中,与最低三分位相比,总活动处于最高三分位的人有两倍以上的可能性具有良好的食欲(优势比[OR]2.16(1.15-4.06))。每天久坐行为每增加 1%,良好食欲的可能性就会降低 3%(OR 0.97(0.95-0.996)),而每天轻强度体力活动每增加 1%,良好食欲的可能性就会增加 4%(OR 1.02(1.01-1.06))。而佩戴在手腕上的加速度计与食欲之间没有发现任何关联。
在社区居住的老年人中,食欲、加速度计评估的体力活动和久坐行为与加速度计的位置之间的关系不同。本研究强调了从不同身体部位获取加速度计数据并与同时发生的健康结果进行仔细解释的重要性。