Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Sep;43(18):2602-2609. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1706648. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
This study examined if the relationship between the rate of oxygen uptake (V̇O) and output from hip-and wrist-worn accelerometers differs between adults with and without DS, and evaluated the accuracy of accelerometer output in estimating V̇O.
Sixteen adults with DS (10 men) and 19 adults without DS (10 men) performed 12 tasks including physical activities and sedentary behaviors. We measured V̇O with portable spirometry and accelerometer output (vector magnitude [VM]) with hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers. We used multi-level regressions to predict V̇O from VM, group, body mass index (BMI), age, height, weight, and sex. We evaluated prediction accuracy with absolute percent error and Bland-Altman plots.
For both hip- and wrist-accelerometers, VM and group significantly predicted V̇O ( ≤ 0.021). When BMI was added, BMI was a significant predictor but group was not. The final models included VM and BMI ( ≤ 0.001; = 0.78 and 0.57, for hip and wrist accelerometer model, respectively). Absolute error was greater for the wrist- than the hip-accelerometer model (wrist: 37.9 ± 38.1%; hip: 22.5 ± 27.4%).
Adults with DS have different V̇O to VM responses, and this appears due to their higher BMI. Predictability of V̇O from accelerometer output is better for hip- than wrist-worn accelerometers.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONOutput from a triaxial accelerometer has high potential in predicting the energy expenditure and classifying the intensity of physical activity and sedentary behavior in adults with Down syndrome.Accuracy of predicting energy expenditure from accelerometer output is better for hip- than wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers.The development of appropriate rehabilitation interventions that include physical activity for improving health and function in adults with Down syndrome requires accurate assessments of physical activity levels.
本研究旨在探讨髋部和腕部佩戴的加速度计的摄氧量(V̇O)与输出率之间的关系在唐氏综合征(DS)成人和非 DS 成人之间是否存在差异,并评估加速度计输出在估计 V̇O 方面的准确性。
16 名唐氏综合征成人(10 名男性)和 19 名非唐氏综合征成人(10 名男性)完成了包括体力活动和久坐行为在内的 12 项任务。我们使用便携式肺活量计测量 V̇O,使用髋部和腕部佩戴的加速度计测量加速度计输出(向量幅度[VM])。我们使用多水平回归模型从 VM、组、体重指数(BMI)、年龄、身高、体重和性别预测 V̇O。我们使用绝对百分比误差和 Bland-Altman 图评估预测准确性。
对于髋部和腕部加速度计,VM 和组均显著预测 V̇O(≤0.021)。当加入 BMI 时,BMI 是一个显著的预测因素,但组不是。最终模型包括 VM 和 BMI(≤0.001;髋部和腕部加速度计模型的 =0.78 和 0.57)。腕部加速度计模型的绝对误差大于髋部加速度计模型(腕部:37.9±38.1%;髋部:22.5±27.4%)。
唐氏综合征成人的 V̇O 与 VM 反应不同,这似乎是由于他们的 BMI 较高所致。加速度计输出对 V̇O 的预测能力在髋部加速度计上优于腕部加速度计。
三轴加速度计的输出具有很高的潜力,可以预测唐氏综合征成人的能量消耗,并对体力活动和久坐行为的强度进行分类。从加速度计输出预测能量消耗的准确性在髋部加速度计上优于腕部加速度计。为了提高唐氏综合征成人的健康和功能,需要开发包括体力活动在内的适当康复干预措施,这就需要对体力活动水平进行准确评估。