运动觉敏感性的测量：对多伊尔及其同事的回应
Measurement of kinaesthetic sensitivity: a reply to Doyle and colleagues.
作者信息
Bairstow P J, Laszlo J I
出版信息
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Apr;28(2):194-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03854.x.
Doyle and colleagues (1986) are critical of the methodology employed in previous studies on the measurement of kinaesthetic sensitivity. Their criticisms are inappropriate in the context of the purpose and the final form of a standardized test of kinaesthetic sensitivity (Laszlo and Bairstow 1985b). They suggest an alternative methodology and imply--on the basis of a lack of correlation between different measures of sensitivity--that it is superior to the earlier methodology. The two methodologies give different measures of kinaesthetic sensitivity, and the reasons for a lack of correlation are discussed.
多伊尔及其同事（1986年）对先前关于动觉敏感性测量研究中所采用的方法提出了批评。在动觉敏感性标准化测试的目的和最终形式的背景下（拉兹洛和贝尔斯托，1985年b），他们的批评是不恰当的。他们提出了一种替代方法，并基于不同敏感性测量之间缺乏相关性暗示该方法优于早期方法。这两种方法给出了不同的动觉敏感性测量结果，并对缺乏相关性的原因进行了讨论。
Zotero 插件