Suppr超能文献

2-in-1 型钙螯合与抗菌根管冲洗剂的生物学和化学性质。

Biological and chemical properties of 2-in-1 calcium-chelating and antibacterial root canal irrigants.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Microbiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Dent. 2023 Jul;134:104526. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104526. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the capacity of canal wall smear layer removal, precipitation caused by irrigant interaction, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of three 2-in-1 root canal irrigating solutions.

METHODS

Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with QMix, SmearOFF, Irritrol or 0.9% saline. Each tooth was evaluated for smear layer removal using scanning electron microscopy. Precipitation after interaction of the irrigating solutions with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was evaluated with H nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectroscopy. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Neutral red and clonogenic assays were performed on Chinese hamster V79 cells to evaluate the short-term and long-term cytotoxicity of the irrigants.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between QMix and SmearOFF in eliminating smear layers from the coronal-third and middle-third of the canal spaces. In the apical-third, SmearOFF removed smear layers effectively. Irritrol incompletely removed smear layers from all the canal-thirds. When mixed with NaOCl, precipitation was evident only with Irritrol. QMix demonstrated a higher E. faecalis cell death percentage and a smaller biovolume. SmearOFF exhibited a larger decrease in biovolume compared with Irritrol, although Irritrol had a higher death percentage. Irritrol was more cytotoxic than the other irrigants on a short-term interval. In terms of long-term cytotoxicity, both Irritrol and QMix were cytotoxic.

CONCLUSION

QMix and SmearOFF performed better in smear layer removal and antimicrobial activity. QMix and Irritrol were cytotoxic when compared to SmearOFF. Irritrol was associated with precipitation after interacting with NaOCl.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Evaluation of the smear layer removal capability, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of 2-in-1 root canal irrigants is necessary to ensure that they are safe to use during root canal treatment.

摘要

目的

评估三种 2-in-1 根管冲洗液去除管壁玷污层、与冲洗液相互作用产生沉淀、抗菌活性和细胞毒性的能力。

方法

40 颗单根牙经机械预备后分别用 QMix、SmearOFF、Irritrol 或 0.9%生理盐水冲洗。用扫描电子显微镜评估每种牙根管壁玷污层的去除情况。用氢核磁共振波谱法评估冲洗液与次氯酸钠(NaOCl)相互作用后沉淀的形成。用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜评估冲洗液对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌活性。用中性红和集落形成试验对中国仓鼠 V79 细胞进行短期和长期细胞毒性试验。

结果

QMix 和 SmearOFF 在去除牙根管冠三分之一和中三分之一的玷污层方面无显著差异。在根尖三分之一处,SmearOFF 能有效去除玷污层。Irritrol 不能彻底去除所有根管段的玷污层。与 NaOCl 混合时,仅 Irritrol 可见明显沉淀。QMix 对粪肠球菌的杀灭率较高,生物量较小。SmearOFF 的生物量较 Irritrol 下降更大,而 Irritrol 的杀灭率更高。Irritrol 在短期时比其他冲洗液的细胞毒性更大。在长期细胞毒性方面,Irritrol 和 QMix 均有细胞毒性。

结论

QMix 和 SmearOFF 在去除玷污层和抗菌活性方面表现更好。与 SmearOFF 相比,QMix 和 Irritrol 具有细胞毒性。Irritrol 与 NaOCl 相互作用后会产生沉淀。

临床意义

评估 2-in-1 根管冲洗液的去除玷污层能力、抗菌活性和细胞毒性,有助于确保在根管治疗期间安全使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验