Suppr超能文献

双效冲洗剂与不同激活技术去除玷污层效果的比较。

Comparisons of the smear layer removal efficacy of dual-action irrigants and different activation techniques.

作者信息

Chen Yanyan, Watanabe Satoshi, Myint Phu Yadanar Aung, Mochizuki Sota, Okiji Takashi

机构信息

Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):877-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Dual-action root canal irrigants containing disinfectant(s) and chelator(s) are expected to enhance root canal cleaning efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these irrigants and different activation techniques on smear layer removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-six extracted human mandibular premolars were root canal-prepared up to an apical size of #40/0.06, grouped and irrigated as follows, and the smear layer on each third of the canal wall was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. In Experiment 1, syringe irrigation (SI) was carried out using a dual-action irrigant (Triton or SmearOFF) or a combination of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (n = 12, each). In Experiment 2, Triton was activated by laser-activated irrigation (LAI) with a novel Er:YAG laser equipment (Adverl SH, Morita Manufacturing, Kyoto, Japan), an LAI protocol called shockwave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), or ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI), and irrigated with SI (n = 10, each).

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, the Triton group demonstrated significantly better smear layer scores than the EDTA and NaOCl combination group across all canal thirds ( < 0.05). In Experiment 2, using Triton as the irrigant, the LAI and SWEEPS groups exhibited significantly superior smear layer scores compared to the UAI group across all canal thirds ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Triton was more effective than the combination of EDTA and NaOCl in removing the smear layer across all root canal thirds. The efficacy of Triton was further enhanced by activation with LAI and SWEEPS.

摘要

背景/目的:含有消毒剂和螯合剂的双效根管冲洗剂有望提高根管清理效率。本研究旨在评估这些冲洗剂及不同激活技术对玷污层去除的效果。

材料与方法

选取76颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙,根管预备至根尖尺寸为#40/0.06,分组并按以下方式冲洗,使用扫描电子显微镜评估根管壁每三分之一处的玷污层。在实验1中,使用双效冲洗剂(Triton或SmearOFF)或17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)与6%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)的组合进行注射器冲洗(SI)(每组n = 12)。在实验2中,使用新型铒激光设备(Adverl SH,日本森田制造公司,京都)通过激光激活冲洗(LAI)、一种名为冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)的LAI方案或超声激活冲洗(UAI)激活Triton,并进行SI冲洗(每组n = 10)。

结果

在实验1中,Triton组在所有根管三分之一处的玷污层评分均显著优于EDTA和NaOCl组合组(P < 0.05)。在实验2中,以Triton作为冲洗剂时,LAI组和SWEEPS组在所有根管三分之一处的玷污层评分均显著优于UAI组(P < 0.05)。

结论

在去除所有根管三分之一处的玷污层方面,Triton比EDTA和NaOCl的组合更有效。通过LAI和SWEEPS激活可进一步提高Triton的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cc/11993013/264200f8d178/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparisons of the smear layer removal efficacy of dual-action irrigants and different activation techniques.
J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):877-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in conservatively instrumented root canals.
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1546-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Dec;39(12):759-765. doi: 10.1089/photob.2021.0044. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Effect of Laser-Activated Irrigations on Smear Layer Removal from the Root Canal Wall.
Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Dec;35(12):688-694. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4266. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.
Int Endod J. 1999 Jan;32(1):32-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x.
9
Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
Int Endod J. 2001 Jun;34(4):308-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00395.x.
10
In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions.
Eur Endod J. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):81-88. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.19042. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning efficacy and apical pressure in sonically-activated irrigation systems: Impact of tip vertical stroke.
J Dent Sci. 2025 Jul;20(3):1571-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in conservatively instrumented root canals.
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1546-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Effectiveness of Triton Irrigation Solution in Smear Layer Removal: An in-vitro Study.
Eur Endod J. 2024 Mar 8;9(2):139 - 145. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.58070. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions.
Eur Endod J. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):81-88. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.19042. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
Dual effectiveness of a novel all-in-one endodontic irrigating solution in antibiofilm activity and smear layer removal.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 1;11:1254927. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1254927. eCollection 2023.
7
Biological and chemical properties of 2-in-1 calcium-chelating and antibacterial root canal irrigants.
J Dent. 2023 Jul;134:104526. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104526. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
8
Effect of SWEEPS and PIPS techniques on dye extrusion in photodynamic therapy procedure after root canal preparation.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023 Jun;42:103345. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103345. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
9
Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Dec;39(12):759-765. doi: 10.1089/photob.2021.0044. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验