Upregulation of alveolar fluid clearance is not sufficient for Na,K-ATPase β subunit-mediated gene therapy of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice.

Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ALI/ARDS) is characterized by diffuse alveolar damage and significant edema accumulation, which is associated with impaired alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) and alveolar-capillary barrier disruption, leading to acute respiratory failure. Our previous data showed that electroporation-mediated gene delivery of the Na, K-ATPase β1 subunit not only increased AFC, but also restored alveolar barrier function through upregulation of tight junction proteins, leading to treatment of LPS-induced ALI in mice. More importantly, our recent publication showed that gene delivery of MRCKα, the downstream effector of β1 subunit-mediated signaling towards upregulation of adhesive junctions and epithelial and endothelial barrier integrity, also provided therapeutic potential for ARDS treatment in vivo but without necessarily accelerating AFC, indicating that for ARDS treatment, improving alveolar capillary barrier function may be of more benefit than improving fluid clearance. In the present study, we investigated the therapeutical potential of β2 and β3 subunits, the other two β isoforms of Na, K-ATPase, for LPS-induced ALI. We found that gene transfer of either the β1, β2, or β3 subunits significantly increased AFC compared to the basal level in naïve animals and each gave similar increased AFC to each other. However, unlike that of the β1 subunit, gene transfer of the β2 or β3 subunit into pre-injured animal lungs failed to show the beneficial effects of attenuated histological damage, neutrophil infiltration, overall lung edema, or increased lung permeability, indicating that β2 or β3 gene delivery could not treat LPS induced lung injury. Further, while β1 gene transfer increased levels of key tight junction proteins in the lungs of injured mice, that of either the β2 or β3 subunit had no effect on levels of tight junction proteins. Taken together, this strongly suggests that restoration of alveolar-capillary barrier function alone may be of equal or even more benefit than improving AFC for ALI/ARDS treatment.