School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
The Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University - Western Health Partnership, St Albans, VIC, 3021, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09382-y.
Hospital clinical staff have reported poor psychosocial wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about community health service staff who undertake various roles including education, advocacy and clinical services, and work with a range of clients. Few studies have collected longitudinal data. The aim of this study was to assess the psychological wellbeing of community health service staff in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic at two time points in 2021.
A prospective cohort design with an anonymous cross-sectional online survey administered at two time points (March/April 2021; n = 681 and September/October 2021; n = 479). Staff (clinical and non-clinical roles) were recruited from eight community health services in Victoria, Australia. Psychological wellbeing was assessed using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and resilience using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). General linear models were used to measure the effects of survey time point, professional role and geographic location on DASS-21 subscale scores, adjusting for selected sociodemographic and health characteristics.
There were no significant differences in respondent sociodemographic characteristics between the two surveys. Staff's mental health declined as the pandemic continued. Adjusting for dependent children, professional role, general health status, geographic location, COVID-19 contact status and country of birth; depression, anxiety and stress scores were significantly higher for respondents in the second survey than the first (all p < 0.001). Professional role and geographic location were not statistically significantly associated with scores on any of the DASS-21 subscales. Higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress were reported among respondents who were younger, and had less resilience or poorer general health.
The psychological wellbeing of community health staff was significantly worse at the time of the second survey than the first. The findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has had an ongoing and cumulative negative impact on staff wellbeing. Staff would benefit from continued wellbeing support.
医院临床工作人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间报告称心理健康状况不佳。鲜为人知的是,从事各种角色(包括教育、宣传和临床服务)并与各种客户合作的社区卫生服务人员。很少有研究收集纵向数据。本研究的目的是在 2021 年两次时间点评估澳大利亚社区卫生服务人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况。
采用前瞻性队列设计,于 2021 年 3/4 月(n=681)和 9/10 月(n=479)两次时间点进行匿名横断面在线调查。工作人员(临床和非临床角色)从澳大利亚维多利亚州的八家社区卫生服务机构招募。使用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)评估心理健康状况,使用简要韧性量表(BRS)评估韧性。使用一般线性模型测量调查时间点、专业角色和地理位置对 DASS-21 子量表评分的影响,同时调整选定的社会人口学和健康特征。
两次调查中,受访者的社会人口学特征无显著差异。随着大流行的持续,员工的心理健康状况恶化。调整有受抚养子女、专业角色、一般健康状况、地理位置、COVID-19 接触状况和出生国家后;第二次调查的受访者的抑郁、焦虑和压力评分均显著高于第一次(均 p<0.001)。专业角色和地理位置与 DASS-21 任何子量表的评分均无统计学显著关联。报告抑郁、焦虑和压力较高的受访者年龄较小,韧性较低或整体健康状况较差。
第二次调查时社区卫生人员的心理健康状况明显差于第一次。研究结果表明,COVID-19 大流行对员工的福祉产生了持续的累积负面影响。员工将受益于持续的福祉支持。